Johansson v. Janssen, 2020 BCSC 469
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Judge | Smith |
Citation | 2020 BCSC 469 |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Docket Number | E192826 |
Date | 30 March 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Y.Q. v. J.D.,
...to repatriating children were not considered urgent because those children could not be brought home: Johansson v. Janssen, 2020 BCSC 469 at para. [70] In the meantime, through counsel, Y.Q. demanded video parenting time with A.D. On June 23, 2020, ......
-
Parenting In A Pandemic: The BC Courts Weigh In
...whether a father's application for his children to return to BC from Germany constituted an urgent matter in Johansson v. Janssen, 2020 BCSC 469. It remains to be seen whether the Thomas v. Wohleber factors, or a similar test, will be adopted in In Johansson v. Janssen, the parties lived in......
-
Johansson v. Janssen,
...due to the COVID-19 pandemic and had put in place a process for hearing only the most urgent matters. In reasons for judgment indexed at 2020 BCSC 469, I held that the matter was not urgent because international travel restrictions then in force made immediate return of the children impossi......
-
Campbell v. Chan, 2020 BCSC 665
...April 21, 2020. There was no response on the record before me to counsel for the mother’s April 13, letter. [39] In Johansson v. Janssen, 2020 BCSC 469, Justice Smith confirmed at para. 16 that passing the screening for RUH process “does not constitute a final determination that a matter is......
3 cases
-
Y.Q. v. J.D.,
...to repatriating children were not considered urgent because those children could not be brought home: Johansson v. Janssen, 2020 BCSC 469 at para. [70] In the meantime, through counsel, Y.Q. demanded video parenting time with A.D. On June 23, 2020, ......
-
Johansson v. Janssen,
...due to the COVID-19 pandemic and had put in place a process for hearing only the most urgent matters. In reasons for judgment indexed at 2020 BCSC 469, I held that the matter was not urgent because international travel restrictions then in force made immediate return of the children impossi......
-
Campbell v. Chan, 2020 BCSC 665
...April 21, 2020. There was no response on the record before me to counsel for the mother’s April 13, letter. [39] In Johansson v. Janssen, 2020 BCSC 469, Justice Smith confirmed at para. 16 that passing the screening for RUH process “does not constitute a final determination that a matter is......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Parenting In A Pandemic: The BC Courts Weigh In
...whether a father's application for his children to return to BC from Germany constituted an urgent matter in Johansson v. Janssen, 2020 BCSC 469. It remains to be seen whether the Thomas v. Wohleber factors, or a similar test, will be adopted in In Johansson v. Janssen, the parties lived in......