Johnson et al. v. Studley et al.

JurisdictionOntario
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
JudgePerell, J.
Citation[2014] O.T.C. Uned. 1732 (SC),2014 ONSC 1732,[2014] O.T.C. Uned. 1732
Date18 March 2014
Subject MatterLIMITATION OF ACTIONS,PRACTICE

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
25 practice notes
  • Banman v. Ontario
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 31, 2023
    ...Tobacco Growers Marketing Board) v. Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc., 2016 ONSC 3939; Colin v. Tan, 2016 ONSC 1187; Johnson v. Studley, 2014 ONSC 1732; Giroux Estate v. Trillium Health Centre, (2005) 74 O.R. (3d) 341 (C.A.); M.(K.) v. M.(H.), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6; Guerin v. The Queen, [1984]......
  • Windsor Energy Inc. et al. v. Northrup et al.
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada)
    • June 8, 2015
    ...147; 69 N.R. 321; 75 N.S.R.(2d) 109; 186 A.P.R. 109, refd to. [para. 48]. Johnson et al. v. Studley et al., [2014] O.T.C. Uned. 1732; 2014 ONSC 1732, refd to. [para. WIC Radio Ltd. v. Simpson - see Simpson v. Mair et al. Simpson v. Mair et al. (2008), 376 N.R. 80; 256 B.C.A.C. 1; 431 W.A.C.......
  • Enns v. Goertzen
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 15, 2019
    ...yet known – certainty is not a requirement: Longo v. MacLaren Art Centre Inc., 2014 ONCA 526 (CanLII) at para. 44 and Johnson v. Studley, 2014 ONSC 1732 (CanLII) at para. c. “Neither the extent of damage nor the type of damage need be known. To hold otherwise would inject too much uncertain......
  • JARDINE v. SASKATOON POLICE SERVICE
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • July 21, 2017
    ...against the police officers until he learned that fact. That being so, the following comment by Perell J. in Johnson v Studley, 2014 ONSC 1732 – with which I agree – is of particular interest: 60 …the discovery of a claim does not depend upon the plaintiff knowing that his or her claim is l......
  • Get Started for Free
23 cases
  • Banman v. Ontario
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 31, 2023
    ...Tobacco Growers Marketing Board) v. Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc., 2016 ONSC 3939; Colin v. Tan, 2016 ONSC 1187; Johnson v. Studley, 2014 ONSC 1732; Giroux Estate v. Trillium Health Centre, (2005) 74 O.R. (3d) 341 (C.A.); M.(K.) v. M.(H.), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6; Guerin v. The Queen, [1984]......
  • Windsor Energy Inc. et al. v. Northrup et al.
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada)
    • June 8, 2015
    ...147; 69 N.R. 321; 75 N.S.R.(2d) 109; 186 A.P.R. 109, refd to. [para. 48]. Johnson et al. v. Studley et al., [2014] O.T.C. Uned. 1732; 2014 ONSC 1732, refd to. [para. WIC Radio Ltd. v. Simpson - see Simpson v. Mair et al. Simpson v. Mair et al. (2008), 376 N.R. 80; 256 B.C.A.C. 1; 431 W.A.C.......
  • Enns v. Goertzen
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 15, 2019
    ...yet known – certainty is not a requirement: Longo v. MacLaren Art Centre Inc., 2014 ONCA 526 (CanLII) at para. 44 and Johnson v. Studley, 2014 ONSC 1732 (CanLII) at para. c. “Neither the extent of damage nor the type of damage need be known. To hold otherwise would inject too much uncertain......
  • JARDINE v. SASKATOON POLICE SERVICE
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • July 21, 2017
    ...against the police officers until he learned that fact. That being so, the following comment by Perell J. in Johnson v Studley, 2014 ONSC 1732 – with which I agree – is of particular interest: 60 …the discovery of a claim does not depend upon the plaintiff knowing that his or her claim is l......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Securities Litigation Snapshot 29 May 2014
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 2, 2014
    ...distributed accordingly. Other Court Proceedings Motions for Summary Judgment Motion for Breach of Limitation Periods Johnson v. Studley, 2014 ONSC 1732 In Johnson v. Studley, the Ontario Superior Court considered two related summary judgment motions brought by the defendants, John Studley ......
  • Limitation Periods And The "Appropriate Means" Test In Suing Prior Counsel
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 2, 2025
    ...Growers' Marketing Board v. Rothmans, Benson & Hedges, Inc., 2014 ONSC 3469 5. Miletic v. Jaksic, 2014 ONSC 5043 6. Johnson v. Studley, 2014 ONSC 1732, 2014 CarswellOnt 3286 7. Alliance v. Gardiner Roberts, 2020 ONSC 68 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to t......