Johnston et al. v. Griffiths et al.
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Ontario Superior Court of Justice |
| Judge | Callaghan |
| Citation | 2025 ONSC 2048 |
| Docket Number | CV-22-00691787-0000 |
| Date | 14 April 2025 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 29 – July 3, 2026)
...Open Window Bakery Ltd., 2004 SCC 9, Johnson v. Studley, 2014 ONSC 1732, Bhoola v. Vaughan (City), 2024 ONSC 103, Johnston v. Griffiths, 2025 ONSC 2048 facts: The appellant appeals the order striking out his Statement of Claim on a motion under r. 21 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. The app......
-
Paterson v. Royal Bank of Canada
...ONSC 103, 41 C.L.R. (5th) 84, at paras. 89-102; Taylor v. David, 2021 ONSC 3264, at para. 46, aff’d 2022 ONCA 200; Johnston v. Griffiths, 2025 ONSC 2048, 176 O.R. (3d) 463, at paras. 63-64. The extent to which active conduct on the part of the defendant is required in order to toll the ulti......
-
Paterson v Royal Bank of Canada
...ONSC 103, 41 C.L.R. (5th) 84, at paras. 89–102; Taylor v. David, 2021 ONSC 3264, at para. 46, aff'd 2022 ONCA 200; Johnston v. Griffiths, 2025 ONSC 2048, 176 O.R. (3d) 463, at paras. 63–64. The extent to which active conduct on the part of the defendant is required in order to toll the ulti......
2 cases
-
Paterson v. Royal Bank of Canada
...ONSC 103, 41 C.L.R. (5th) 84, at paras. 89-102; Taylor v. David, 2021 ONSC 3264, at para. 46, aff’d 2022 ONCA 200; Johnston v. Griffiths, 2025 ONSC 2048, 176 O.R. (3d) 463, at paras. 63-64. The extent to which active conduct on the part of the defendant is required in order to toll the ulti......
-
Paterson v Royal Bank of Canada
...ONSC 103, 41 C.L.R. (5th) 84, at paras. 89–102; Taylor v. David, 2021 ONSC 3264, at para. 46, aff'd 2022 ONCA 200; Johnston v. Griffiths, 2025 ONSC 2048, 176 O.R. (3d) 463, at paras. 63–64. The extent to which active conduct on the part of the defendant is required in order to toll the ulti......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 29 – July 3, 2026)
...Open Window Bakery Ltd., 2004 SCC 9, Johnson v. Studley, 2014 ONSC 1732, Bhoola v. Vaughan (City), 2024 ONSC 103, Johnston v. Griffiths, 2025 ONSC 2048 facts: The appellant appeals the order striking out his Statement of Claim on a motion under r. 21 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. The app......
