Jones v. I.F. Propco

JurisdictionOntario
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
JudgeJUSTICE L.C. LEITCH
Citation2018 ONSC 23
Date04 January 2018
Docket Number4300/14

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
9 practice notes
  • Defence + Indemnity: April 2018 - III. Emerging Technology Issues
    • Canada
    • JD Supra Canada
    • May 25, 2018
    ...she planned to call witnesses to testify to the differences between her pre and post-accident activity levels. Jones v. I.F. Propco., 2018 ONSC 23, per Leitch, J. I. FACTS AND ISSUES The Plaintiff claimed $2,400,000 in damages, alleging that while on the Defendant’s premises ice fell on her......
  • Case Summary: Jones v. I.F. Propco
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 17, 2018
    ...she planned to call witnesses to testify to the differences between her pre and post-accident activity levels. Jones v. I.F. Propco., 2018 ONSC 23, per Leitch, J. FACTS AND ISSUES The Plaintiff claimed $2,400,000 in damages, alleging that while on the Defendant's premises ice fell on her he......
  • Neville-Lake et al. v. Muzzo et al.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 7, 2022
    ...me to relevant case law. Counsel for Mr. Muzzo has directed me to the decision of Leitch J. of this Court in Jones v. I.F. Propco, 2018 ONSC 23.  In that case, involving a motor vehicle accident, the Court considered a defence request for the Plaintiff to produce her Facebook account f......
  • Privacy And Social Media – Not Just A Numbers Game
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 2, 2018
    ...rights. The Ontario Superior Court considered these competing values recently in the context of a refusals motion in Jones v IF Propco, 2018 ONSC 23. In that decision, Justice Leitch vindicated privacy interests that have been given insufficient attention in many The Plaintiff claimed she w......
  • Get Started for Free
4 cases
  • Neville-Lake et al. v. Muzzo et al.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 7, 2022
    ...me to relevant case law. Counsel for Mr. Muzzo has directed me to the decision of Leitch J. of this Court in Jones v. I.F. Propco, 2018 ONSC 23.  In that case, involving a motor vehicle accident, the Court considered a defence request for the Plaintiff to produce her Facebook account f......
  • Isacov v Schwartzberg,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 11, 2018
    ...the privacy argument has little weight. [32] Earlier this year in L.C. Leitch J. in Jones v. I.F. Propco Holdings (Ontario) 31 Ltd., 2018 ONSC 23 had occasion to review the applicable law in a somewhat similar case. There she observed: 39 In Murphy, Rady J. concluded that any invasion of pr......
  • Beiko v. Stone,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 22, 2019
    ...but serve no legitimate purpose in resolving the issues. [Emphasis in original.] [29] In Jones v. I.F. Propco Holdings (Ontario) 31 Ltd., 2018 ONSC 23, after discussing the decision in McGee, Leach J. summarized the law as follows (para. Therefore, permissible redaction requires two element......
  • West Niagara Baseball Association v Dobbin,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 10, 2025
    ...with respect to complaints…” and “all documents in relation to complaints received…”. 39 According to this court in Jones v. I.F. Propco, 2018 ONSC 23, at para. 52: “[P]ermissible redaction requires two elements: the information that is sought to be redacted must be irrelevant and there mus......
5 firm's commentaries
  • Defence + Indemnity: April 2018 - III. Emerging Technology Issues
    • Canada
    • JD Supra Canada
    • May 25, 2018
    ...she planned to call witnesses to testify to the differences between her pre and post-accident activity levels. Jones v. I.F. Propco., 2018 ONSC 23, per Leitch, J. I. FACTS AND ISSUES The Plaintiff claimed $2,400,000 in damages, alleging that while on the Defendant’s premises ice fell on her......
  • Case Summary: Jones v. I.F. Propco
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 17, 2018
    ...she planned to call witnesses to testify to the differences between her pre and post-accident activity levels. Jones v. I.F. Propco., 2018 ONSC 23, per Leitch, J. FACTS AND ISSUES The Plaintiff claimed $2,400,000 in damages, alleging that while on the Defendant's premises ice fell on her he......
  • Privacy And Social Media – Not Just A Numbers Game
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 2, 2018
    ...rights. The Ontario Superior Court considered these competing values recently in the context of a refusals motion in Jones v IF Propco, 2018 ONSC 23. In that decision, Justice Leitch vindicated privacy interests that have been given insufficient attention in many The Plaintiff claimed she w......
  • Broad Discovery And Social Media Disclosure Affirmed In Muzzo Ats Neville-Lake
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 25, 2022
    ...posts and information, the motion judge referred to prior decisions on the scope of disclosure for social media. In Jones v. I.F. Propco, 2018 ONSC 23, which also involved a motor vehicle accident, the court considered a request for the plaintiff to produce her Facebook account for a period......
  • Get Started for Free