Justifying Infringements of Section 7

AuthorHamish Stewart
Pages349-370
349
CHAPTER 6
JUSTIFYING
INFRINGEMENTS
OFSECTION 7
A. INTRODUCTION
Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms read s as follows:
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights
and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits
prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justif‌ied in a free and
democratic society.1
Section 1 has a dual character: it guarantees Charter rights and it pro-
vides a criterion for limiting them.2
Section 1 refers to “limits” on Charter rights. This language might
suggest that some violations of Charter rights cannot be justif‌ied
because they go beyond merely “limiting” a given right to denying it
altogether.3 Or it might suggest that section 1 helps to def‌ine rights by
specifying their “limits.”4 But the Supreme Court of Canada has not
1 Canadian Char ter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982,
being Schedule B to t he Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11, s 1 [Charter].
2 R v Oakes, [1986] 1 SCR 103 at 135 [Oakes].
3 See, for insta nce, R v Morgentaler, [1988] 1 SCR 30 at 183 [Morgentaler], Wilson J;
R v Sharpe, 1999 BCCA 416 at paras 93– 94 (BCCA), Southin JA, rev’d 2001 SCC 2.
4 Grégoire Webber, “La disposition limit ative de la Charte cana dienne: une invi-
tation à déf‌ini r les droits et libertés aux c ontours indéterminés” in LB Trembl ay
& Grégoire Webber, eds, The Limitation of Charter Rights: Crit ical Essays on R v
Oakes (Montréal: Thémis, 2009).
FUNDAMENTAL JUSTICE350
adopted either of these approaches. The Court has never rejected a sec-
tion 1 argument on the ground that the v iolation of the right in question
was so severe that it did not count as a limit. And, although the effect of
a successful section 1 justif‌ication is in effect to redraw the boundaries
of a right, the Court has consistently treated section 1 arguments as
justif‌ications for infr ingements of rights rather than as def‌in itions of the
boundaries of rights. Rather than drawing a distinction between justi-
f‌iable or def‌initional “limits” and unjustif‌iable “violations,” the Court
has considered how the criteria for justif‌ication under section 1 apply
to each infringement of a Charter right. An egregious infringement of
a Charter right is and should be very diff‌icult to justify under section 1,
but that is because of the way the criteria for justif‌ication apply to the
infringement, not because of its description as an “infringement” rather
than as a “limit” or “boundary.
B. THE TEST FOR JUSTIFICATION UNDER
SECTION 1
The test for whether a legal limit on a Charter right is “reasonable” and
“demonstrably justif‌ied in a free and democratic society” is laid out in
several steps by the well-known Oakes test.5 The limit on a right must:
be “prescribed by law”;6
have an objective relating to “concerns which are pressing and sub-
stantial in a free and democratic society”;7 and
meet a three-part test for proportionality requiring that the limit
»“be rationally connected to the objective”;8
»impair the right as little as reasonably possible;9 and
»have a salutary ef fect on the objective that is not outweighed by its
deleterious effects on the r ight.10
Every element of this test has been considerably elaborated in the cases
followingOakes. In this chapter, I make no attempt to trace these develop-
ments in detail; instead, I discuss each element of the Oakes test with
reference to a number of efforts to justify a limit on the section 7 right.
5 Oakes, above note 2.
6 Charter, above note 1, s 1; Alberta v Hutte rian Brethren of Wilson Colony, 2009
SCC 37 at paras 39– 40 [Hutterian B rethren].
7 Oakes, above note 2 at 138–39.
8 Ibid at 139.
9 Ibid.
10Ibid at 139– 40.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT