K.K. v. M.M., 2021 ONCA 407
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Zarnett J.A. |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ONCA 407 |
| Citation | 2021 ONCA 407 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Docket Number | M52479 & M52499 (C69393) |
| Date | 08 June 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (JUNE 7 ' 11)
...Insurance Co. (2002), 61 O.R. (3d) 481, Boucher v. Wal-Mart Canada Corp., 2014 ONCA 419, Rutman v. Rabinowitz, 2018 ONCA 80 K.K. v. M.M., 2021 ONCA 407 Keywords: Family Law, Custody and Access, Civil Procedure, Appeals, Stay Pending Appeal, Security for Costs, Children's Law Reform Act, R.S......
-
2024 ONCA 923,
...to grant a stay”: N. v. F., 2021 ONCA 688, 158 O.R. (3d) 565, at para. 36, citing D.C. v T.B., 2021 ONCA 562, at para. 9; K.K. v. M.M., 2021 ONCA 407, at para. 18 Every decision on a stay motion involves a discretionary balancing of factors and is entitled to significant deference. On a rev......
-
A.A. v Z.M.,
...to grant a stay”: N. v. F., 2021 ONCA 688, 158 O.R. (3d) 565, at para. 36, citing D.C. v T.B., 2021 ONCA 562, at para. 9; K.K. v. M.M., 2021 ONCA 407, at para. 18 Every decision on a stay motion involves a discretionary balancing of factors and is entitled to significant deference. On a rev......
2 cases
-
2024 ONCA 923,
...to grant a stay”: N. v. F., 2021 ONCA 688, 158 O.R. (3d) 565, at para. 36, citing D.C. v T.B., 2021 ONCA 562, at para. 9; K.K. v. M.M., 2021 ONCA 407, at para. 18 Every decision on a stay motion involves a discretionary balancing of factors and is entitled to significant deference. On a rev......
-
A.A. v Z.M.,
...to grant a stay”: N. v. F., 2021 ONCA 688, 158 O.R. (3d) 565, at para. 36, citing D.C. v T.B., 2021 ONCA 562, at para. 9; K.K. v. M.M., 2021 ONCA 407, at para. 18 Every decision on a stay motion involves a discretionary balancing of factors and is entitled to significant deference. On a rev......
1 firm's commentaries
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (JUNE 7 ' 11)
...Insurance Co. (2002), 61 O.R. (3d) 481, Boucher v. Wal-Mart Canada Corp., 2014 ONCA 419, Rutman v. Rabinowitz, 2018 ONCA 80 K.K. v. M.M., 2021 ONCA 407 Keywords: Family Law, Custody and Access, Civil Procedure, Appeals, Stay Pending Appeal, Security for Costs, Children's Law Reform Act, R.S......