Kapoor v. Makkar,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Saunders,The Honourable Madam Justice Dickson,The Honourable Mr. Justice Grauer |
| Citation | 2020 BCCA 223 |
| Date | 30 July 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Docket Number | CA46702 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
49 practice notes
-
2024 BCSC 544,
...such an order is either necessary or expedient, and if they cannot meet that onus, then the status quo should prevail: Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 223 (“ Kapoor”) at para. 23. Claimant's Position 54 The claimant's position is that the Court should order sale of the Property, pursuant to Rul......
-
Mynio v Mynio,
...such an order is either necessary or expedient, and if they cannot meet that onus, then the status quo should prevail: Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 223 (“ Kapoor”) at para. 23. Claimant's Position 54 The claimant's position is that the Court should order sale of the Property, pursuant to Rul......
-
Party A v. British Columbia (Securities Commission),
...Lord Woolf et al, De Smith’s Judicial Review, 6th ed (London, UK: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007), at 324–25; Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 223. [219] This general rule is recognized in court proceedings to set aside an injunction that is obtained without noti......
-
A.M. v. Dr. F,
...is vigorously enforced because the court must rely on counsel for the applicant for both the facts and the law: Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 223 at para. 11. As Justice Gomery states: “Orders of this nature are readily subject to abuse. That is why the law imposes on a party seeking one an o......
Get Started for Free
33 cases
-
Mynio v Mynio
...such an order is either necessary or expedient, and if they cannot meet that onus, then the status quo should prevail: Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 223 (“ Kapoor”) at para. 23. Claimant's Position 54 The claimant's position is that the Court should order sale of the Property, pursuant to Rul......
-
Party A v. British Columbia (Securities Commission)
...Lord Woolf et al, De Smith’s Judicial Review, 6th ed (London, UK: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007), at 324–25; Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 223. [219]     This general rule is recognized in court proceedings to set aside an injunction that is obtained without noti......
-
A.M. v. Dr. F
...is vigorously enforced because the court must rely on counsel for the applicant for both the facts and the law: Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 223 at para. 11. As Justice Gomery states: “Orders of this nature are readily subject to abuse. That is why the law imposes on a party seeking one an o......
-
P. v H
...or expedient, or there are any doubts regarding the justice of such an order, then the status quo should prevail: Kapoor v. Makkar, 2020 BCCA 223 at para. 22. 19 The question of whether a sale is “necessary” is primarily concerned with the parties' financial circumstances, including whether......
Get Started for Free