Kapur et al. v. Konevic et al., 2020 ONSC 5706
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | C. Gilmore, J. |
| Citation | 2020 ONSC 5706 |
| Docket Number | CV-20-00641310-00CL |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Date | 24 September 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Table of cases
...Co (1987), 43 DLR (4th) 369 (BCSC) .............................................................................. 53 Kapur v Konevic, 2020 ONSC 5706 .....................................................................98 Karpacheva v Karpachev, [2018] ONSC 4563 ...................................
-
Interlocutory Injunctions: Specific Areas
...66 CPR (4th) 385 at para 8 (Ont SCJ); DCR Strategies Inc v Vector Card Services, LLC , 2011 ONSC 5473 at para 21; Kapur v Konevic , 2020 ONSC 5706 at para 61. But note that this only applies where the applicant has “clearly” demonstrated breach of the restraint of trade clause; see Plaza Co......
-
Fitness Franchise Fails To Obtain Injunction To Stop Rebranding Of Fitness Studio During The Pandemic
...Justice Hackland followed the line of cases that required Greco to demonstrate a strong prima facie case: Kapur et al v. Konevic, 2020 ONSC 5706. Justice Hackland agreed with Greco that the operation of TG Athletics would be in clear violation of the Franchise Agreement should it continue t......
-
Kapur v. Konevic,
...The motion for leave to appeal the order of Gilmore J. dated September 24, 2020, Kapur v. Konevic, 2020 ONSC 5706, is dismissed. [2] Costs to the Responding Parties are fixed at $10,000.00. ____......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 cases
-
Kapur v. Konevic,
...The motion for leave to appeal the order of Gilmore J. dated September 24, 2020, Kapur v. Konevic, 2020 ONSC 5706, is dismissed. [2] Costs to the Responding Parties are fixed at $10,000.00. ____......
-
Greco Franchising Inc. v. Franco Milito et al. 2021,
...case is needed where an injunction will interfere with a person’s ability to earn a livelihood, see Kapur et al v. Konevic et al., 2020 ONSC 5706. Irreparable Harm and Balance of [27] Irreparable harm and balance of convenience are closely related ......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Fitness Franchise Fails To Obtain Injunction To Stop Rebranding Of Fitness Studio During The Pandemic
...Justice Hackland followed the line of cases that required Greco to demonstrate a strong prima facie case: Kapur et al v. Konevic, 2020 ONSC 5706. Justice Hackland agreed with Greco that the operation of TG Athletics would be in clear violation of the Franchise Agreement should it continue t......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...Co (1987), 43 DLR (4th) 369 (BCSC) .............................................................................. 53 Kapur v Konevic, 2020 ONSC 5706 .....................................................................98 Karpacheva v Karpachev, [2018] ONSC 4563 ...................................
-
Interlocutory Injunctions: Specific Areas
...66 CPR (4th) 385 at para 8 (Ont SCJ); DCR Strategies Inc v Vector Card Services, LLC , 2011 ONSC 5473 at para 21; Kapur v Konevic , 2020 ONSC 5706 at para 61. But note that this only applies where the applicant has “clearly” demonstrated breach of the restraint of trade clause; see Plaza Co......