Ke-Kin-Is-Uqs v. B.C., [2005] B.C.T.C. 1712 (SC)
Judge | Lynn Smith, J. |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Case Date | December 06, 2005 |
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Citations | [2005] B.C.T.C. 1712 (SC);2005 BCSC 1712 |
Ke-Kin-Is-Uqs v. B.C., [2005] B.C.T.C. 1712 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2005] B.C.T.C. TBEd. DE.068
Ke-Kin-Is-Uqs, also known as Judith Sayers, Chief Councillor suint on her own behalf and on behalf of all members of the Hupacasath First Nation, the Hupacasath First Nation Council and the Hupacasath First Nation (petitioners) v. Minister of Forests of the Province of British Columbia, the Chief Forester and Brascan Corporation (respondents)
(L043095; 2005 BCSC 1712)
Indexed As: Ke-Kin-Is-Uqs et al. v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests) et al.
British Columbia Supreme Court
Vancouver
Lynn Smith, J.
December 6, 2005.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Forests and Forest Products - Topic 2439
Forest regulation - Licensing - Effect of aboriginal title claim - See paragraphs 74 to 326.
Indians, Inuit and Métis - Topic 3
General - Duty owed to Indians by Crown - See paragraphs 74 to 326.
Indians, Inuit and Métis - Topic 3.1
General - Judicial review of exercise of Crown's duty to Indians - See paragraphs 74 to 326.
Counsel:
P.R. Grant and D. Schultze, for the petitioners;
G.R. Thompson, for the respondents, Minister of Forests and the Chief Forester;
D.R. Clark, Q.C., for the respondent, Brascan Corp.
This case was heard on July 11-15, 2005, before Lynn Smith, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on December 6, 2005.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lameman et al. v. Alberta et al., 2013 ABCA 148
...refd to. [para. 47]. Ke-Kin-Is-Uqs et al. v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests) et al., [2005] B.C.T.C. 1712; 51 B.C.L.R.(4th) 133; 2005 BCSC 1712, refd to. [para. Hupacasath First Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests) - see Ke-Kin-Is-Uqs et al. v. British Columbia (Minister ......
-
Association of Iroquois and Allied Indians v. Ontario (Minister of Environment, Conservation and Parks),
...Columbia (Minister of Forests), 2002 BCSC 1701, 10 BCLR (4th) 126; Hupacasath First Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests), 2005 BCSC 1712, 51 BCLR (4th) [50] Klahoose First Nation v. Sunshine Coast Forest District (Dist. Mgr.), 2008 BCSC 1642, [2009] 1 CNLR 110. [51] Dene Tha&apo......
-
Brokenhead Ojibway Nation et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., (2009) 345 F.T.R. 119 (FC)
...refd to. [para. 22]. Ke-Kin-Is-Uqs et al. v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests) et al., [2005] B.C.T.C. 1712; 51 B.C.L.R.(4h) 133; 2005 BCSC 1712, refd to. [para. Hupacasath First Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests) - see Ke-Kin-Is-Uqs et al. v. British Columbia (Minister o......
-
Single Mothers’ Alliance of BC Society v. British Columbia, 2019 BCSC 1427
...4th ed. (Toronto: Thompson Reuters Canada Ltd., 2016), and in Hupacasath First Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests) et al, 2005 BCSC 1712 at paras. 292–294, but in BCCLA itself at para. 267. [174] Returning to the test that is to be applied to strike pleadings that I have set ou......
-
Lameman et al. v. Alberta et al., 2013 ABCA 148
...refd to. [para. 47]. Ke-Kin-Is-Uqs et al. v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests) et al., [2005] B.C.T.C. 1712; 51 B.C.L.R.(4th) 133; 2005 BCSC 1712, refd to. [para. Hupacasath First Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests) - see Ke-Kin-Is-Uqs et al. v. British Columbia (Minister ......
-
Association of Iroquois and Allied Indians v. Ontario (Minister of Environment, Conservation and Parks),
...Columbia (Minister of Forests), 2002 BCSC 1701, 10 BCLR (4th) 126; Hupacasath First Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests), 2005 BCSC 1712, 51 BCLR (4th) [50] Klahoose First Nation v. Sunshine Coast Forest District (Dist. Mgr.), 2008 BCSC 1642, [2009] 1 CNLR 110. [51] Dene Tha&apo......
-
Brokenhead Ojibway Nation et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., (2009) 345 F.T.R. 119 (FC)
...refd to. [para. 22]. Ke-Kin-Is-Uqs et al. v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests) et al., [2005] B.C.T.C. 1712; 51 B.C.L.R.(4h) 133; 2005 BCSC 1712, refd to. [para. Hupacasath First Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests) - see Ke-Kin-Is-Uqs et al. v. British Columbia (Minister o......
-
Single Mothers’ Alliance of BC Society v. British Columbia, 2019 BCSC 1427
...4th ed. (Toronto: Thompson Reuters Canada Ltd., 2016), and in Hupacasath First Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests) et al, 2005 BCSC 1712 at paras. 292–294, but in BCCLA itself at para. 267. [174] Returning to the test that is to be applied to strike pleadings that I have set ou......
-
Federal Court Affirms Regulatory Process May Satisfy Duty To Consult
...Ka'a'Gee Tu Decisions, the court also cited the British Columbia Supreme Court's decision in Hupacasath First Nation v. British Columbia, 2005 BCSC 1712, as authority for proposition. The court was careful to point out that this is not a delegation of the Crown's duty to consult; rather, th......
-
Issues associated with the implementation of the duty to consult and accommodate aboriginal peoples: threatening the goals of reconciliation and meaningful consultation.
...2008) at 38, online: [Morellato, "Crown's Constitutional Duty"]. (33) Hupacasath First Nation v British Columbia (Minister of Forests), 2005 BCSC 1712 at para 274, 51 BCLR (4th) 133 (34) See e.g. Musqueam Indian Band v British Columbia (Minister of Sustainable Resource Management), 2005 BCC......