Kell v. Senych Estate et al., 2003 NWTSC 65

JudgeRichard, J.
CourtSupreme Court of Northwest Territories (Canada)
Case DateOctober 27, 2003
JurisdictionNorthwest Territories
Citations2003 NWTSC 65;[2003] Northwest Terr. Cases 65 (SC)

Kell v. Senych Estate, [2003] Northwest Terr. Cases 65 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2003] Northwest Terr. Cases TBEd. NO.042

Cecilia Kell (plaintiff) v. Craig Senych as Administrator for the Estate of William Senych (deceased), The Northwest Territories Housing Corporation and William Pourier (defendants)

(CV 06332; 2003 NWTSC 65)

Indexed As: Kell v. Senych Estate et al.

Northwest Territories Supreme Court

Richard, J.

November 3, 2003.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Practice - Topic 5360

Dismissal of action - Grounds - General and want of prosecution - Delay - See paragraphs 1 to 23.

Cases Noticed:

Filipchuk v. Ladouceur et al. (2001), 277 A.R. 192; 242 W.A.C. 192 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 13].

Poole Construction Ltd. v. Wood and Gardiner Architects, [1989] N.W.T.R. 354, refd to. [para. 15].

Statutes Noticed:

Rules of Court (N.W.T.), Supreme Court Rules, rule 327(1), rule 327(4) [para. 12].

Counsel:

Charles McGee, for the plaintiff;

Elaine Keenan Bengts, for the Estate of William Senych;

Sheldon Toner, for the defendant, NWT Housing Corp.

This application was heard at Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, on October 27, 2003, before Richard, J., of the Northwest Territories Supreme Court, who delivered the following judgment on November 3, 2003.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • 943639 NWT v. Dominion of Can., [2012] Northwest Terr. Cases Uned. 12 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Northwest Territories Supreme Court of Northwest Territories (Canada)
    • February 3, 2012
    ...to the applicant is presumed, pursuant to Rule 327(4). It is then up to the respondent to rebut that presumption. Kell v. Senych Estate, 2003 NWTSC 65; Watsyk v. Northwest Territories (Financial Board Secretariat), 2010 NWTSC 74, [2010] N.W.T.J. No. 68. [14] What is "inordinate" d......
1 cases
  • 943639 NWT v. Dominion of Can., [2012] Northwest Terr. Cases Uned. 12 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Northwest Territories Supreme Court of Northwest Territories (Canada)
    • February 3, 2012
    ...to the applicant is presumed, pursuant to Rule 327(4). It is then up to the respondent to rebut that presumption. Kell v. Senych Estate, 2003 NWTSC 65; Watsyk v. Northwest Territories (Financial Board Secretariat), 2010 NWTSC 74, [2010] N.W.T.J. No. 68. [14] What is "inordinate" d......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT