Kellett v. Stam, 2018 BCSC 1127

JudgeHonourable Madam Justice Gerow
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateJuly 06, 2018
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2018 BCSC 1127
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
24 practice notes
  • 2023 BCSC 894,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...BCCA 131 at para. 15. The court must consider both positive and negative contingencies when conducting this analysis: Kellett v. Stam, 2018 BCSC 1127 at para. C. Analysis 130 I am satisfied that Mr. Dhami has established that the injuries suffered in the MVC have impaired his income earning......
  • Block v. Schmitt, 2019 BCSC 1575
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 18, 2019
    ...at paras. 25-32. [187] The court must consider both positive and negative contingencies when conducting this analysis: Kellett v. Stam, 2018 BCSC 1127 at para. [188] The questions to ask in assessing whether loss of earning capacity has been proven were set out in Brown v. Golaiy (1985), 26......
  • Bates v. Buchanan,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 26, 2023
    ...BCCA 131 at para. 15. The court must consider both positive and negative contingencies when conducting this analysis: Kellett v. Stam, 2018 BCSC 1127 at para. Impairment of Capital Asset [149]    The parties agree that the earnings approach does not apply in this case. [150]&......
  • Dhami v Kennedy,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 26, 2023
    ...BCCA 131 at para. 15. The court must consider both positive and negative contingencies when conducting this analysis: Kellett v. Stam, 2018 BCSC 1127 at para. C. Analysis 130 I am satisfied that Mr. Dhami has established that the injuries suffered in the MVC have impaired his income earning......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
24 cases
  • Bates v. Buchanan,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 26, 2023
    ...BCCA 131 at para. 15. The court must consider both positive and negative contingencies when conducting this analysis: Kellett v. Stam, 2018 BCSC 1127 at para. Impairment of Capital Asset [149]    The parties agree that the earnings approach does not apply in this case. [150]&......
  • Dhami v Kennedy,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 26, 2023
    ...BCCA 131 at para. 15. The court must consider both positive and negative contingencies when conducting this analysis: Kellett v. Stam, 2018 BCSC 1127 at para. C. Analysis 130 I am satisfied that Mr. Dhami has established that the injuries suffered in the MVC have impaired his income earning......
  • 2023 BCSC 894,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...BCCA 131 at para. 15. The court must consider both positive and negative contingencies when conducting this analysis: Kellett v. Stam, 2018 BCSC 1127 at para. C. Analysis 130 I am satisfied that Mr. Dhami has established that the injuries suffered in the MVC have impaired his income earning......
  • Block v. Schmitt, 2019 BCSC 1575
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 18, 2019
    ...at paras. 25-32. [187] The court must consider both positive and negative contingencies when conducting this analysis: Kellett v. Stam, 2018 BCSC 1127 at para. [188] The questions to ask in assessing whether loss of earning capacity has been proven were set out in Brown v. Golaiy (1985), 26......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT