Kemp v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 2015 ABPC 204

JudgeHaymour, P.C.J.
CourtProvincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
Case DateThursday September 24, 2015
Citations2015 ABPC 204

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • Abbas v Esurance Insurance Company of Canada
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 6, 2023
    ...necessary and salutary rule which deserves to be better known by the public”). [35] See Kemp v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co., 2015 ABPC 204 & Pitchon v. Meloche Monnex Inc., 2005 ABPC 174; 28 C.C.L.I. 4th 321 (the Court relied on Swan Hills to deny a dishonest insured in reco......
  • 2023 ABCA 36
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...a necessary and salutary rule which deserves to be better known by the public”). 35 See Kemp v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co., 2015 ABPC 204 & Pitchon v. Meloche Monnex Inc., 2005 ABPC 174; 28 C.C.L.I. 4th 321 (the Court relied on Swan Hills to deny a dishonest insured in reco......
  • Abbas v Esurance Insurance Company of Canada
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 6, 2023
    ...a necessary and salutary rule which deserves to be better known by the public”). 35 See Kemp v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co., 2015 ABPC 204 & Pitchon v. Meloche Monnex Inc., 2005 ABPC 174; 28 C.C.L.I. 4th 321 (the Court relied on Swan Hills to deny a dishonest insured in reco......
3 cases
  • Abbas v Esurance Insurance Company of Canada,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 6, 2023
    ...necessary and salutary rule which deserves to be better known by the public”). [35] See Kemp v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co., 2015 ABPC 204 & Pitchon v. Meloche Monnex Inc., 2005 ABPC 174; 28 C.C.L.I. 4th 321 (the Court relied on Swan Hills to deny a dishonest insured in reco......
  • 2023 ABCA 36,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...a necessary and salutary rule which deserves to be better known by the public”). 35 See Kemp v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co., 2015 ABPC 204 & Pitchon v. Meloche Monnex Inc., 2005 ABPC 174; 28 C.C.L.I. 4th 321 (the Court relied on Swan Hills to deny a dishonest insured in reco......
  • Abbas v Esurance Insurance Company of Canada,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 6, 2023
    ...a necessary and salutary rule which deserves to be better known by the public”). 35 See Kemp v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co., 2015 ABPC 204 & Pitchon v. Meloche Monnex Inc., 2005 ABPC 174; 28 C.C.L.I. 4th 321 (the Court relied on Swan Hills to deny a dishonest insured in reco......