Kendall v. Bouchard

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
JudgeHonourable Madam Justice Francis
Citation2020 BCSC 727
Date03 March 2020
Docket NumberS145569

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • Rahman v. Windermere Valley Property Management Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • July 25, 2022
    ...Hospital, 2002 BCSC 104; Bell v. Reis and Wigmore, 2016 BCSC 309 at para. 104, aff’d 2017 BCCA 82; Kendall v. Bouchard, 2020 BCSC 727 at paras. 43–44. In Ounjian, at para. 21, Tysoe J. (as he then was) identified the following four components, all of which must ......
  • Rahman v Windermere Valley Property Management Ltd
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 27, 2025
    ...a court that there is no genuine issue for trial justifying summary judgment under R. 9-6: at para. 37. As stated in Kendall v. Bouchard, 2020 BCSC 727, a claim may be suitable to be dismissed on the basis of a limitation period if there is sufficient and adequate evidence on the record to ......
  • Kendall v. Bouchard
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • January 27, 2021
    ...Madam Justice Fisher On appeal from:  An order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, dated March 3, 2020 (Kendall v. Bouchard, 2020 BCSC 727, Vancouver Docket Oral Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Appellants, appearing via videoconference: B. Martyniuk M.B.J. Stainsby Counsel f......
3 cases
  • Rahman v. Windermere Valley Property Management Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • July 25, 2022
    ...Hospital, 2002 BCSC 104; Bell v. Reis and Wigmore, 2016 BCSC 309 at para. 104, aff’d 2017 BCCA 82; Kendall v. Bouchard, 2020 BCSC 727 at paras. 43–44. In Ounjian, at para. 21, Tysoe J. (as he then was) identified the following four components, all of which must ......
  • Rahman v Windermere Valley Property Management Ltd
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 27, 2025
    ...a court that there is no genuine issue for trial justifying summary judgment under R. 9-6: at para. 37. As stated in Kendall v. Bouchard, 2020 BCSC 727, a claim may be suitable to be dismissed on the basis of a limitation period if there is sufficient and adequate evidence on the record to ......
  • Kendall v. Bouchard
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • January 27, 2021
    ...Madam Justice Fisher On appeal from:  An order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, dated March 3, 2020 (Kendall v. Bouchard, 2020 BCSC 727, Vancouver Docket Oral Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Appellants, appearing via videoconference: B. Martyniuk M.B.J. Stainsby Counsel f......