Kennedy v Carry the Kettle First Nation, 2020 SKCA 32
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Barrington-Foote,The Honourable Madam Justice Ryan-Froslie,The Honourable Mr. Justice Kalmakoff |
Citation | 2020 SKCA 32 |
Docket Number | CACV3502 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
Date | 25 March 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Linklater v. Thunderchild First Nation Government, 2020 FC 1065
...46. Thunderchild laws would not derive their authority from Canadian law: see, for example, Kennedy v Carry the Kettle First Nation, 2020 SKCA 32 at paragraph 7. Their source of legitimacy would be separate. Legal theorists would say that they have a different rule of recognition or Grundno......
-
Windels v Reddekopp,
...nevertheless be consistent with the words chosen by Parliament” (at para 33). See also Kennedy v Carry the Kettle First Nation, 2020 SKCA 32 at para 27, 73 Admin LT (6th) 183, and Regina Bypass Design Builders v Supreme Steel LP, 2021 SKCA 82 at paras 103 The question, then, is wheth......
-
Carry The Kettle First Nation v. Kennedy,
...the appeal, determining that the Federal Court had exclusive jurisdiction over the matter (Kennedy v Carry the Kettle First Nation, 2020 SKCA 32 [Kennedy]). [13] Following the decision in Kennedy, the Minority Tribunal Members, after the purported removal of the Majority Tribunal Members an......
-
Windels v Reddekopp,
...be consistent with the words chosen by Parliament” (at para 33). See also Kennedy v Carry the Kettle First Nation, 2020 SKCA 32 at para 27, 73 Admin LT (6th) 183, and Regina Bypass Design Builders v Supreme Steel LP, 2021 SKCA 82 at paras 23–28. [103] ......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Linklater v. Thunderchild First Nation Government, 2020 FC 1065
...46. Thunderchild laws would not derive their authority from Canadian law: see, for example, Kennedy v Carry the Kettle First Nation, 2020 SKCA 32 at paragraph 7. Their source of legitimacy would be separate. Legal theorists would say that they have a different rule of recognition or Grundno......
-
Windels v Reddekopp,
...nevertheless be consistent with the words chosen by Parliament” (at para 33). See also Kennedy v Carry the Kettle First Nation, 2020 SKCA 32 at para 27, 73 Admin LT (6th) 183, and Regina Bypass Design Builders v Supreme Steel LP, 2021 SKCA 82 at paras 103 The question, then, is wheth......
-
Carry The Kettle First Nation v. Kennedy,
...the appeal, determining that the Federal Court had exclusive jurisdiction over the matter (Kennedy v Carry the Kettle First Nation, 2020 SKCA 32 [Kennedy]). [13] Following the decision in Kennedy, the Minority Tribunal Members, after the purported removal of the Majority Tribunal Members an......
-
Windels v Reddekopp,
...be consistent with the words chosen by Parliament” (at para 33). See also Kennedy v Carry the Kettle First Nation, 2020 SKCA 32 at para 27, 73 Admin LT (6th) 183, and Regina Bypass Design Builders v Supreme Steel LP, 2021 SKCA 82 at paras 23–28. [103] ......
Request a trial to view additional results