Khan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 438
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FC 438 |
| Date | 28 March 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Frank v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 696
...RAD’s decisions concerning admissibility of evidence demand deference from this Court (Khan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 438 at para 32). The RAD must also ensure that, when assessing the admissibility of new evidence pursuant to subsection 110(4) of the IRPA, it e......
-
Rehman v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 783
...clarification, contrary to the requirements of procedural fairness. The Applicant refers to Khan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 438 [Khan] in support of this position. Respondent’s position [28] The Respondent submits that there is no requirement for the RAD to seek clarifi......
-
Morales v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 133
...been accepted, but rather whether the RAD’s admissibility determination is reasonable: Khan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 438 at para 28 [Khan]. In that vein, deference is owed to the RAD’s determinations of the admissibility of evidence: Frank v Canada (Citi......
-
Lemus Oliva v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1429
...RAD’s decisions concerning admissibility of evidence demand deference from this Court (Khan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 438 at para 32 [Khan]). Subsection 110(4) of the IRPA states that, in an appeal to the RAD, an appellant “may present only evidence that ......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
Frank v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 696
...RAD’s decisions concerning admissibility of evidence demand deference from this Court (Khan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 438 at para 32). The RAD must also ensure that, when assessing the admissibility of new evidence pursuant to subsection 110(4) of the IRPA, it e......
-
Rehman v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 783
...clarification, contrary to the requirements of procedural fairness. The Applicant refers to Khan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 438 [Khan] in support of this position. Respondent’s position [28] The Respondent submits that there is no requirement for the RAD to seek clarifi......
-
Morales v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 133
...been accepted, but rather whether the RAD’s admissibility determination is reasonable: Khan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 438 at para 28 [Khan]. In that vein, deference is owed to the RAD’s determinations of the admissibility of evidence: Frank v Canada (Citi......
-
Lemus Oliva v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1429
...RAD’s decisions concerning admissibility of evidence demand deference from this Court (Khan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 438 at para 32 [Khan]). Subsection 110(4) of the IRPA states that, in an appeal to the RAD, an appellant “may present only evidence that ......
Request a trial to view additional results