Kim v Choi, 2020 ABQB 51

JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice Peter Michalyshyn
Citation2020 ABQB 51
Docket Number1303 09884
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Date21 January 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Kim v Choi,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 16 Agosto 2021
    ...plus judgment interest and solicitor and own client costs and granting other relief. As more fully explained in the reported reasons at 2020 ABQB 51, the decision was a close call but the judgment was set aside. Notwithstanding the Chois’ success in the set-aside application, owing t......
  • Hyland-Hoolihan v Hancock,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 14 Diciembre 2021
    ...the rule is to be found, and as such, it is an outlier. [58]        Other cases, including Kim v Choi, 2020 ABQB 51 and Kraushar v Kraushar, 2019 ABCA 186 clearly establish that the test is not an “all or nothing” proposition. I accept [59]&#......
  • SFM v MRM, 2020 ABQB 302
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 1 Mayo 2020
    ...1-3 and Rimmer v. Adshead, 2002 SKCA 12 at paras 34-57. [6] 2013 ABCA 366 at paras 21-34 [7] 2010 ABQB 833 at para 49 (Poelman J.) [8] 2020 ABQB 51. To the same effect, see 1402445 Alberta Ltd v 1722353 Alberta Ltd[8], 2018 ABQB 546 (Burrows J.) at paras 19-23 [9] 2016 ABCA 35 [10] 1998 ABQ......
3 cases
  • Kim v Choi,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 16 Agosto 2021
    ...plus judgment interest and solicitor and own client costs and granting other relief. As more fully explained in the reported reasons at 2020 ABQB 51, the decision was a close call but the judgment was set aside. Notwithstanding the Chois’ success in the set-aside application, owing t......
  • Hyland-Hoolihan v Hancock,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 14 Diciembre 2021
    ...the rule is to be found, and as such, it is an outlier. [58]        Other cases, including Kim v Choi, 2020 ABQB 51 and Kraushar v Kraushar, 2019 ABCA 186 clearly establish that the test is not an “all or nothing” proposition. I accept [59]&#......
  • SFM v MRM, 2020 ABQB 302
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 1 Mayo 2020
    ...1-3 and Rimmer v. Adshead, 2002 SKCA 12 at paras 34-57. [6] 2013 ABCA 366 at paras 21-34 [7] 2010 ABQB 833 at para 49 (Poelman J.) [8] 2020 ABQB 51. To the same effect, see 1402445 Alberta Ltd v 1722353 Alberta Ltd[8], 2018 ABQB 546 (Burrows J.) at paras 19-23 [9] 2016 ABCA 35 [10] 1998 ABQ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT