Kitikmeot Corp. v. Hamlet of Cambridge Bay, [2006] Nunavut Cases 16 (CJ)

JudgeJohnson, J.
CourtNunavut Court of Justice (Canada)
Case DateApril 25, 2006
JurisdictionNunavut
Citations[2006] Nunavut Cases 16 (CJ);2006 NUCJ 16

Kitikmeot Corp. v. Cambridge Bay, [2006] Nunavut Cases 16 (CJ)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2006] Nunavut Cases TBEd. AU.057

Kitikmeot Corporation (applicant) v. Municipal Corporation of the Hamlet of Cambridge Bay (respondent)

(21-05-490 CVU; 2006 NUCJ 16)

Indexed As: Kitikmeot Corp. v. Hamlet of Cambridge Bay

Nunavut Court of Justice

Iqaluit

Johnson, J.

July 26, 2006.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Editor's Note: Certain names in the following case have been initialized or the case otherwise edited to prevent the disclosure of identities where required by law, publication ban, Maritime Law Book's editorial policy or otherwise.

Municipal Law - Topic 1483

Powers of municipalities - Particular powers - Imposition and collection of taxes or fees - See paragraphs 1 to 65.

Municipal Law - Topic 1486

Powers of municipalities - Particular powers - Respecting water supply, frains and sewers - See paragraphs 1 to 65.

Municipal Law - Topic 3846

Bylaws - Quashing bylaws - Grounds for judicial interference - Discrimination - See paragraphs 1 to 65.

Municipal Law - Topic 3884

Bylaws - Quashing bylaws - Judicial review - Practice - Standard of review - See paragraph 40.

Municipal Law - Topic 3890

Bylaws - Quashing bylaws - Judicial review - Practice - Limitation period - See paragraphs 1 to 26.

Counsel:

James Thorlakson, for the applicant;

Jonathan P. Rossall, for the respondent.

This case was heard on April 25, 2006, at Cambridge Bay, Nunavut, by Johnson, J., of the Nunavut Court of Justice, who released the following judgment on July 26, 2006.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 practice notes
  • R. v. Mulholland (S.H.), [2014] Yukon Cases Uned. (SC) 3
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Yukon
    • 17 Enero 2014
    ...Courts of Appeal in the respective territories: see, for example, Norris v. Norris , 2005 NWTSC 18; and Kitikmeot Corp. v. Cambridge Bay , 2006 NUCJ 16. Indeed, both of these decisions were recognized by the sentencing judge at para. 33 of his reasons, cited at R. v. Mulholland, 2013 YKTC 5......
  • R. v. Mulholland (S.H.), [2013] Yukon Cases Uned. (TC) 52
    • Canada
    • Territorial Court of Yukon (Canada)
    • 26 Junio 2013
    ...Northwest Territories Court of Appeal is largely made up of members of the Alberta Court of Appeal. and Kitikmeot Corp. v. Cambridge Bay , 2006 NUCJ 16, where the Nunavut Court of Justice states in para. 22 that: This Alberta case law is very persuasive. In addition, Alberta case law is giv......
2 cases
  • R. v. Mulholland (S.H.), [2014] Yukon Cases Uned. (SC) 3
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Yukon
    • 17 Enero 2014
    ...Courts of Appeal in the respective territories: see, for example, Norris v. Norris , 2005 NWTSC 18; and Kitikmeot Corp. v. Cambridge Bay , 2006 NUCJ 16. Indeed, both of these decisions were recognized by the sentencing judge at para. 33 of his reasons, cited at R. v. Mulholland, 2013 YKTC 5......
  • R. v. Mulholland (S.H.), [2013] Yukon Cases Uned. (TC) 52
    • Canada
    • Territorial Court of Yukon (Canada)
    • 26 Junio 2013
    ...Northwest Territories Court of Appeal is largely made up of members of the Alberta Court of Appeal. and Kitikmeot Corp. v. Cambridge Bay , 2006 NUCJ 16, where the Nunavut Court of Justice states in para. 22 that: This Alberta case law is very persuasive. In addition, Alberta case law is giv......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT