Klimack et al v Kroeker et al, 2020 MBCA 98
| Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
| Judge | Madam Justice Barbara M. Hamilton,Madam Justice Jennifer A. Pfuetzner,Madam Justice Karen I. Simonsen |
| Citation | 2020 MBCA 98 |
| Date | 07 October 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
| Docket Number | AI19-30-09324 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Niata Enterprises Ltd. et al. v. Snowcat Property Holdings Limited,
...easement, the applicants rely on the leading decision of Klimack v. Kroeker, 2018 MBQB 180, [2018] M.J. No. 322 (QL); affirmed 2020 MBCA 98, [2020] M.J. No. 219, which thoroughly reviews the law of prescriptive easements in Manitoba. It also relies on the Supreme Court of Canada decis......
-
Wilson et al v. Kornelsen,
...and easement over the subservient tenant must prove the following essential elements, as written in Klimack et al v. Kroeker et al, 2020 MBCA 98, at para 1. There must be a dominant tenement and servient tenement; 2. An easement must “accommodate&#......
2 cases
-
Niata Enterprises Ltd. et al. v. Snowcat Property Holdings Limited,
...easement, the applicants rely on the leading decision of Klimack v. Kroeker, 2018 MBQB 180, [2018] M.J. No. 322 (QL); affirmed 2020 MBCA 98, [2020] M.J. No. 219, which thoroughly reviews the law of prescriptive easements in Manitoba. It also relies on the Supreme Court of Canada decis......
-
Wilson et al v. Kornelsen,
...and easement over the subservient tenant must prove the following essential elements, as written in Klimack et al v. Kroeker et al, 2020 MBCA 98, at para 1. There must be a dominant tenement and servient tenement; 2. An easement must “accommodate&#......