KM v LGN, 2020 ABQB 197
Judge | Lema |
Citation | 2020 ABQB 197 |
Date | 30 March 2020 |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
Docket Number | FL13 01750 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
AR v JU, 2021 ABQB 112
...The law on s. 126.11 applications is set out definitively by my colleague Lema J in KM v. LGN, 2020 ABQB 197, referencing several other decisions relevant to aspects of such applications, including JE v. Alberta. For the purpose of these Reasons, I adopt and apply KM v. LGN completely, with......
-
MF v RM,
...material and likely necessary to advance” an applicant’s position was discussed by this Court in KM v LGN, 2020 ABQB 197 at paras 14-22 [KM]. There, the Court considered JE and other authorities. [64] In KM, the Court......
-
JC (Re),
...11 of that decision where he stated: The law on 126.11 applications is set out definitively by my colleague Lema J. in KM v. LGN, 2020 ABQB 197, referencing several other decisions relevant to aspects of such applications, including JE v. Alberta. For the purpose of these Reasons, I a......
3 cases
-
AR v JU, 2021 ABQB 112
...The law on s. 126.11 applications is set out definitively by my colleague Lema J in KM v. LGN, 2020 ABQB 197, referencing several other decisions relevant to aspects of such applications, including JE v. Alberta. For the purpose of these Reasons, I adopt and apply KM v. LGN completely, with......
-
MF v RM,
...material and likely necessary to advance” an applicant’s position was discussed by this Court in KM v LGN, 2020 ABQB 197 at paras 14-22 [KM]. There, the Court considered JE and other authorities. [64] In KM, the Court......
-
JC (Re),
...11 of that decision where he stated: The law on 126.11 applications is set out definitively by my colleague Lema J. in KM v. LGN, 2020 ABQB 197, referencing several other decisions relevant to aspects of such applications, including JE v. Alberta. For the purpose of these Reasons, I a......