Koebisch v Rocky View (County),
| Judge | The Honourable Justice Frederica Schutz,The Honourable Justice Elizabeth Hughes,The Honourable Justice Kevin Feehan |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ABCA 265 |
| Citation | 2021 ABCA 265 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Docket Number | 1901-0311-AC |
| Date | 20 July 2021 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 practice notes
-
Kneehill County v Risler,
...or political factors that were before council when the bylaw was approved: Radomsky at paras 21-23; Koebisch v Rocky View (County), 2021 ABCA 265 at para 107 In my view, the focus of section 554 of the MGA in the context of enforcing planning and development bylaws and statutory plans, shou......
-
Westcan Recyclers Ltd v Calgary (City),
...23-24, 54 Alta LR (6th) 256; Wheatland County v Federated Co-Operatives Limited, 2019 ABCA 513, para 22; Koebisch v Rocky View (County), 2021 ABCA 265, paras 16-17, 460 DLR (4th) 119; Howse v Calgary (City), 2023 ABCA 379, paras 123 When questions of procedural fairness and natural justice ......
-
Canmore (Town of) v Three Sisters Mountain Village Properties Ltd,
...are generally meant “to be interpreted in a flexible, broad, and aspirational manner”: Koebisch v Rocky View (County), 2021 ABCA 265 at para 20 Consistent with this purpose, the implementation plan contemplated that area structure plans for the development would “set to......
-
Canadian Constitution Foundation v Calgary (City),
...standard of review and “[w]hether a bylaw is wise is for a municipal council to decide, not the courts”: Koebisch v Rocky View (County), 2021 ABCA 265 at para 23. In this case, CCF's arguments focused on the City's authority under the MGA, not on the division of powers between Parliament an......
Get Started for Free
9 cases
-
Kneehill County v Risler,
...or political factors that were before council when the bylaw was approved: Radomsky at paras 21-23; Koebisch v Rocky View (County), 2021 ABCA 265 at para 107 In my view, the focus of section 554 of the MGA in the context of enforcing planning and development bylaws and statutory plans, shou......
-
Westcan Recyclers Ltd v Calgary (City),
...23-24, 54 Alta LR (6th) 256; Wheatland County v Federated Co-Operatives Limited, 2019 ABCA 513, para 22; Koebisch v Rocky View (County), 2021 ABCA 265, paras 16-17, 460 DLR (4th) 119; Howse v Calgary (City), 2023 ABCA 379, paras 123 When questions of procedural fairness and natural justice ......
-
Canmore (Town of) v Three Sisters Mountain Village Properties Ltd,
...are generally meant “to be interpreted in a flexible, broad, and aspirational manner”: Koebisch v Rocky View (County), 2021 ABCA 265 at para 20 Consistent with this purpose, the implementation plan contemplated that area structure plans for the development would “set to......
-
Canadian Constitution Foundation v Calgary (City),
...standard of review and “[w]hether a bylaw is wise is for a municipal council to decide, not the courts”: Koebisch v Rocky View (County), 2021 ABCA 265 at para 23. In this case, CCF's arguments focused on the City's authority under the MGA, not on the division of powers between Parliament an......
Get Started for Free