Kosicki v. Toronto (City), 2025 SCC 28

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas; Jamal, Mahmud; O’Bonsawin, Michelle; Moreau, Mary
Citation2025 SCC 28
Date19 September 2025
Docket Number40908
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
18 practice notes
  • R. v. Rousselle, 2025 SCC 35
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 14, 2025
    ...575; Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 SCC 53, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 471; Kosicki v. Toronto (City), 2025 SCC 28; R. v. Alex, 2017 SCC 37, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 967; R. v. St. Pierre, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 791; R. v. Boucher, 2005 SCC 72, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 499; R. v. ......
  • Kosicki v Toronto (City)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • September 19, 2025
    ...General of Ontario, Attorney General of British Columbia, City of Surrey, Advocates for the Rule of Law and City of Ottawa Interveners 2025 SCC 28 Present: Wagner C.J. and Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O'Bonsawin and Moreau JJ. DOCKET: 40908 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Prope......
  • R v Rousselle
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 14, 2025
    ...575; Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 SCC 53, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 471; Kosicki v. Toronto (City), 2025 SCC 28; R. v. Alex, 2017 SCC 37, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 967; R. v. St. Pierre, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 791; R. v. Boucher, 2005 SCC 72, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 499; R. v. ......
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (OCTOBER 13 – 17)
    • Canada
    • LexBlog Canada
    • October 19, 2025
    ...Real Property Limitations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. L.15, s. 4, Land Titles Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. L.5, s. 51, Kosicki v. Toronto (City), 2025 SCC 28, McClatchie v. Rideau Lakes (Township), 2015 ONCA 233, Armstrong v. Moore, 2020 ONCA 49 Constantine Enterprises Inc. v. Mizrahi (128 Hazelton) Inc.,......
  • Get Started for Free
9 cases
  • R. v. Rousselle, 2025 SCC 35
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 14, 2025
    ...575; Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 SCC 53, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 471; Kosicki v. Toronto (City), 2025 SCC 28; R. v. Alex, 2017 SCC 37, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 967; R. v. St. Pierre, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 791; R. v. Boucher, 2005 SCC 72, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 499; R. v. ......
  • Kosicki v Toronto (City)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • September 19, 2025
    ...General of Ontario, Attorney General of British Columbia, City of Surrey, Advocates for the Rule of Law and City of Ottawa Interveners 2025 SCC 28 Present: Wagner C.J. and Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O'Bonsawin and Moreau JJ. DOCKET: 40908 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Prope......
  • R v Rousselle
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 14, 2025
    ...575; Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 SCC 53, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 471; Kosicki v. Toronto (City), 2025 SCC 28; R. v. Alex, 2017 SCC 37, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 967; R. v. St. Pierre, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 791; R. v. Boucher, 2005 SCC 72, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 499; R. v. ......
  • The Canadian Transit Company v Canada (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 27, 2025
    ...[1996] O.J. No. 4399 (Gen. Div.), at paras. 27–28. 24 Canada Factum, para. 1. 25 Canada Factum, para. 3. 26 Kosicki v. Toronto (City), 2025 SCC 28, 507 D.L.R. (4th) 1, at para. 27 Piekut, at para. 44;, R. v. Wilson, 2025 SCC 32, at para. 132, per Jamal J. (dissenting); Bell ExpressVu Limite......
  • Get Started for Free
9 firm's commentaries
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (OCTOBER 13 – 17)
    • Canada
    • LexBlog Canada
    • October 19, 2025
    ...Real Property Limitations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. L.15, s. 4, Land Titles Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. L.5, s. 51, Kosicki v. Toronto (City), 2025 SCC 28, McClatchie v. Rideau Lakes (Township), 2015 ONCA 233, Armstrong v. Moore, 2020 ONCA 49 Constantine Enterprises Inc. v. Mizrahi (128 Hazelton) Inc.,......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 13 ' 17, 2025)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 21, 2025
    ...Real Property Limitations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. L.15, s. 4, Land Titles Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. L.5, s. 51, Kosicki v. Toronto (City), 2025 SCC 28, McClatchie v. Rideau Lakes (Township), 2015 ONCA 233, Armstrong v. Moore, 2020 ONCA 49 Constantine Enterprises Inc. v. Mizrahi (128 Hazelton) Inc.,......
  • SCC Confirms Adverse Possession Of Municipal Parkland In Ontario Remains Alive And Well
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 25, 2025
    ...public policy concerns. On September 19, 2025, the Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") undercut that assumption. In Kosicki v Toronto (City), 2025 SCC 28, a narrow 5 to 4 decision, the SCC held that Ontario's Real Property Limitations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. L.15 ("RPLA"), does not categorically b......
  • The Boundaries Of Common Law: Parkland Is Not Immune From Adverse Possession
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 26, 2025
    ...from claims of adverse possession, and what role does the common law have in claims of adverse possession? In Kosicki v Toronto (City), 2025 SCC 28 (Kosicki), the Supreme Court of Canada (the SCC) answered these questions in a decision that likely has broader implications on the application......
  • Get Started for Free