Kozak Estate (Re), 2018 ABQB 272
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice W. N. Renke |
| Citation | 2018 ABQB 272 |
| Docket Number | ES12 35353 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 10 April 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Edmunds Estate (Re), 2020 ABQB 334
...been willing to base costs on a Column that reflects the value of the estate: Neufeld QB at para 7; Goold at para 3; Kozak Estate (Re), 2018 ABQB 272 at para [28] They argue that, from a costs perspective, there is no conceptual difference between an application for formal proof of a will a......
-
Bowman Estate (Re), 2020 NSSC 48
...Tariff “A” as if the hearing was a trial, 77.07 that the conduct of the party is a relevant consideration (Kozak Estate, 2018 ABQB 272), and 77.13 that Counsel is entitled to reasonable compensation. (The Court notes that Rule 77.13 applies to taxation of costs as ......
-
Stalzer (Estate) v Stalzer, 2020 ABQB 160
...decline to apply the cost consequences intended to flow from successful offers” (at para 15). Based on Kozak Estate (Re), 2018 ABQB 272, the Estate submits that Ms. Stalzer has the burden of showing that the usual rule does not apply because it was not an offer that should reas......
3 cases
-
Edmunds Estate (Re), 2020 ABQB 334
...been willing to base costs on a Column that reflects the value of the estate: Neufeld QB at para 7; Goold at para 3; Kozak Estate (Re), 2018 ABQB 272 at para [28] They argue that, from a costs perspective, there is no conceptual difference between an application for formal proof of a will a......
-
Bowman Estate (Re), 2020 NSSC 48
...Tariff “A” as if the hearing was a trial, 77.07 that the conduct of the party is a relevant consideration (Kozak Estate, 2018 ABQB 272), and 77.13 that Counsel is entitled to reasonable compensation. (The Court notes that Rule 77.13 applies to taxation of costs as ......
-
Stalzer (Estate) v Stalzer, 2020 ABQB 160
...decline to apply the cost consequences intended to flow from successful offers” (at para 15). Based on Kozak Estate (Re), 2018 ABQB 272, the Estate submits that Ms. Stalzer has the burden of showing that the usual rule does not apply because it was not an offer that should reas......