Kufsky v. The Queen, 2019 TCC 254

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtTax Court (Canada)
Citation2019 TCC 254
Date07 November 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Kufsky v. Canada, 2022 FCA 66
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • April 14, 2022
    ...on the unpaid tax debt of the Corporation. She appealed this assessment to the Tax Court of Canada. The Tax Court dismissed her appeal (2019 TCC 254). [3] The issues raised by the Appellant are whether: (a) the amounts paid are dividends for the purposes of section 160 of the Act because, i......
  • Canadian Tax Trap: Dividends From A Corporation With Tax Debts Leads To Derivative Tax Liability: Kufsky V The Queen, 2019 TCC 254 ' Canadian Tax Guidance From A Canadian Tax Lawyer
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 9, 2022
    ...Section 160 captures a broad range of transactions, including dividend payments. The Tax Court's decision in Kufsky v The Queen, 2019 TCC 254, illustrates that, if you receive a dividend from a corporation that has outstanding income-tax debts, section 160 allows the CRA's tax collectors to......
  • Valovic v. The Queen, 2020 TCC 101
    • Canada
    • Tax Court (Canada)
    • September 3, 2020
    ...Duchaine v. The Queen 2015 TCC 245 [the Appellant unsuccessfully argued the consideration was services rendered]; and Kufsky v. The Queen 2019 TCC 254 [the Appellant unsuccessfully argued the consideration was services rendered]. [10] Paragraph 13 of the Partial Agreed Statement of Facts. G......
2 cases
  • Kufsky v. Canada, 2022 FCA 66
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • April 14, 2022
    ...on the unpaid tax debt of the Corporation. She appealed this assessment to the Tax Court of Canada. The Tax Court dismissed her appeal (2019 TCC 254). [3] The issues raised by the Appellant are whether: (a) the amounts paid are dividends for the purposes of section 160 of the Act because, i......
  • Valovic v. The Queen, 2020 TCC 101
    • Canada
    • Tax Court (Canada)
    • September 3, 2020
    ...Duchaine v. The Queen 2015 TCC 245 [the Appellant unsuccessfully argued the consideration was services rendered]; and Kufsky v. The Queen 2019 TCC 254 [the Appellant unsuccessfully argued the consideration was services rendered]. [10] Paragraph 13 of the Partial Agreed Statement of Facts. G......
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT