Kulanayagam v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
JudgeDiner, J.
Citation[2015] F.T.R. Uned. 24 (FC),[2015] F.T.R. Uned. 24,2015 FC 101
Date26 January 2015
Subject MatterIMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,PRACTICE

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
17 practice notes
  • Gombos v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 22, 2017
    ...risk development (Conka v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 984 at para 9; Kulanayagam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 101 at paras [62] The Applicants also submit the Officer’s reliance on the RPD’s decision is problematic because the RPD only considered two inc......
  • Debnath v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 23, 2018
    ...evidence was “simply more of the same, even though it related to new events” (Kulanayagam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 101 at para 33 (“Kulanayagam”)). [48] As to the gender related risk, the RPD was aware of the allegation that the Female Applicant and Minor Applicant ha......
  • Kadder v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 21, 2016
    ...(Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 89, [2012] FCJ No 96 at para 19; Kulanayagam v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 101, [2015] FCJ No 63 at para 21; Alvarez v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 564, [2014] FCJ No 594 at paras 19-20; Dunsmu......
  • Racz v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 12, 2017
    ...concurs. See Ogbonna v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 93 at para 5; Kulanayagam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 101 at para 21; Alvarez v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 564 at paras [21] When reviewing a decision on the standard of reasonablenes......
  • Get Started for Free
17 cases
  • Gombos v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 22, 2017
    ...risk development (Conka v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 984 at para 9; Kulanayagam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 101 at paras [62] The Applicants also submit the Officer’s reliance on the RPD’s decision is problematic because the RPD only considered two inc......
  • Debnath v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 23, 2018
    ...evidence was “simply more of the same, even though it related to new events” (Kulanayagam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 101 at para 33 (“Kulanayagam”)). [48] As to the gender related risk, the RPD was aware of the allegation that the Female Applicant and Minor Applicant ha......
  • Kadder v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 21, 2016
    ...(Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 89, [2012] FCJ No 96 at para 19; Kulanayagam v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 101, [2015] FCJ No 63 at para 21; Alvarez v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 564, [2014] FCJ No 594 at paras 19-20; Dunsmu......
  • Racz v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 12, 2017
    ...concurs. See Ogbonna v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 93 at para 5; Kulanayagam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 101 at para 21; Alvarez v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 564 at paras [21] When reviewing a decision on the standard of reasonablenes......
  • Get Started for Free