Kwok v. Kwok

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHinkson, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Citation[2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. 21,[2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. 21 (SC),2008 BCSC 52
Date14 January 2008

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • Riedel v Sangha
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 4, 2025
    ...beneficiary, Dr. Riedel is not entitled to production of the trustee's solicitor-client privileged communications. 39 In Kwok v. Kwok, 2008 BCSC 52, Hinkson J. stated: 63 Shik Han Kwok removed the plaintiff, the defendant, and their daughter Danvee, as beneficiaries of KIT in July 2003. 64 ......
  • Yang v. Lu
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 9, 2022
    ...p. 893. [23]        The defendants rely on the judgment of Hinkson J. (as he then was) in Kwok v. Kwok, 2008 BCSC 52. I note that although Kwok was not referenced in either the application response or the amended application response, the plaintiffs did no......
  • Morvay v. Warke et al.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 13, 2012
    ...by legal advice privilege is a factual matter and that the burden of proving it rests on the party asserting the privilege: Kwok v. Kwok , 2008 BCSC 52, para. 46. However, I conclude that privilege has been established in this case by Ms. Thériault's affidavit which clearly sets out the nat......
3 cases
  • Riedel v Sangha
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 4, 2025
    ...beneficiary, Dr. Riedel is not entitled to production of the trustee's solicitor-client privileged communications. 39 In Kwok v. Kwok, 2008 BCSC 52, Hinkson J. stated: 63 Shik Han Kwok removed the plaintiff, the defendant, and their daughter Danvee, as beneficiaries of KIT in July 2003. 64 ......
  • Yang v. Lu
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 9, 2022
    ...p. 893. [23]        The defendants rely on the judgment of Hinkson J. (as he then was) in Kwok v. Kwok, 2008 BCSC 52. I note that although Kwok was not referenced in either the application response or the amended application response, the plaintiffs did no......
  • Morvay v. Warke et al.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 13, 2012
    ...by legal advice privilege is a factual matter and that the burden of proving it rests on the party asserting the privilege: Kwok v. Kwok , 2008 BCSC 52, para. 46. However, I conclude that privilege has been established in this case by Ms. Thériault's affidavit which clearly sets out the nat......