KY v Bahler
| Court | Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Renke |
| Judgment Date | 08 May 2023 |
| Citation | 2023 ABKB 280 |
| Docket Number | 1103 14108 |
| Date | 08 May 2023 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 practice notes
-
Savoie v. Lambert
...witness is in the “exclusive control” of the party and is not “equally available to both parties”: Stikeman at paras 87-88; KY v Bahler, 2023 ABKB 280 at para 55; Lupuliak v Condominium Plan No 8211689, 2022 ABQB 65 at para 49; Day v Woodburn, 2019 ABQB 356 at para 287; Spartan Developments......
-
La Trace v. Warkentin Building Movers
...inferences from the facts are sufficient to ground causation (Clements at para 9).[4] [158] In KY v Bahler, 2023 ABKB 280, Renke J stated that the trier of fact infers cause from the evidence. His astute analysis is worth quoting at 832 ......
-
Khaleel v Indar
...find the evidence inadmissible, I allowed the Plaintiff to recall Dr. Khundal to address this new theory. [38] Relying on KY v Bahler, 2023 ABKB 280, the Plaintiff argues that Dr. Smith’s opinion that laparoscopic surgery was not an option, inconsistent with his Form 25 and not based on any......
-
Artindale-Eeles v. Mercer
...[230] Loss of housekeeping capacity can be compensated by pecuniary or non-pecuniary damages. I agree with Renke J in KY v Bahler, 2023 ABKB 280 at para 2637, that the distinction is generally determined by the evidential foundation of the claim. If there is enough evidence to assess the co......
Get Started for Free
9 cases
-
Savoie v. Lambert
...witness is in the “exclusive control” of the party and is not “equally available to both parties”: Stikeman at paras 87-88; KY v Bahler, 2023 ABKB 280 at para 55; Lupuliak v Condominium Plan No 8211689, 2022 ABQB 65 at para 49; Day v Woodburn, 2019 ABQB 356 at para 287; Spartan Developments......
-
La Trace v. Warkentin Building Movers
...inferences from the facts are sufficient to ground causation (Clements at para 9).[4] [158] In KY v Bahler, 2023 ABKB 280, Renke J stated that the trier of fact infers cause from the evidence. His astute analysis is worth quoting at 832 ......
-
Khaleel v Indar
...find the evidence inadmissible, I allowed the Plaintiff to recall Dr. Khundal to address this new theory. [38] Relying on KY v Bahler, 2023 ABKB 280, the Plaintiff argues that Dr. Smith’s opinion that laparoscopic surgery was not an option, inconsistent with his Form 25 and not based on any......
-
KJM v. Kuc
...K.S. (Litigation Representative of) v Willox, 2016 ABQB 483 at para. 661, 32 CCLT (4th) 1; K.Y. (Litigation representative of) v Bahler, 2023 ABKB 280 at para. 1685. Even if it could be argued that the “in trust” claim will indirectly benefit the mother, that does not make her a party so as......
Get Started for Free
