L.T. v. D.T. Estate,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Harris,The Honourable Mr. Justice Goepel,The Honourable Mr. Justice Abrioux |
| Neutral Citation | 2020 BCCA 328 |
| Citation | 2020 BCCA 328 |
| Date | 24 November 2020 |
| Docket Number | CA46587 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Appendix 6 - Consent, Refusal, Embryo as Property
...Parties could not contract out of s 14(3) of Consent Regulations right to withdraw consent prior to use. Citation LT v DT Estate , 2020 BCCA 328 Provision(s) Considered: ss 2, 2(d), 8, 8(1–2), 10, 12, 51, 51(1–2), 61 Summary Appellant and deceased were married, had one child, and planned to......
-
The Importance Of Written Consent: Posthumous Use Of Human Reproductive Material In L.T. v D.T. Estate, 2020 BCCA 328
...both during one's life, and after one's death, requires prior and informed written consent. The recent decision of L.T. v D.T. Estate, 2020 BCCA 328 ['L.T. v D.T.'] is one of the few cases in Canada that deals directly with the use of reproductive material under the Assisted Human Reproduct......
1 firm's commentaries
-
The Importance Of Written Consent: Posthumous Use Of Human Reproductive Material In L.T. v D.T. Estate, 2020 BCCA 328
...both during one's life, and after one's death, requires prior and informed written consent. The recent decision of L.T. v D.T. Estate, 2020 BCCA 328 ['L.T. v D.T.'] is one of the few cases in Canada that deals directly with the use of reproductive material under the Assisted Human Reproduct......
1 books & journal articles
-
Appendix 6 - Consent, Refusal, Embryo as Property
...Parties could not contract out of s 14(3) of Consent Regulations right to withdraw consent prior to use. Citation LT v DT Estate , 2020 BCCA 328 Provision(s) Considered: ss 2, 2(d), 8, 8(1–2), 10, 12, 51, 51(1–2), 61 Summary Appellant and deceased were married, had one child, and planned to......