A.L. v M.L., 2019 SKCA 61

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeJackson, Caldwell and Schwann JJ.A.
Citation2019 SKCA 61
Docket NumberCACV3100
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Date28 June 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 practice notes
  • PRIME v. PRIME, 2020 SKQB 326
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 8 December 2020
    ...happiness is to be considered on this type of application. However, this does not trump all other considerations. In A.L. v M.L., 2019 SKCA 61, 29 RFL (8th) 89, Schwann J.A. 35 The final part of A.L.’s mobility argument is her assertion the trial judge failed to give effect to the &#......
  • TYACKE v TYACKE, 2019 SKQB 271
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 25 October 2019
    ...2007 SCC 17, [2007] 1 SCR 795 [Pecore]. This position, however, is not consistent with the jurisprudence in Saskatchewan: A.L. v M.L, 2019 SKCA 61; Hilmoe v Hilmoe, 2018 SKCA 92, 16 RFL (8th) 288 [Hilmoe]; and Dunnison Estate v Dunnison, 2017 SKCA 40 at para 94, [2017] 8 WWR 18 [35] Jackson......
  • Peterson v Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 7 August 2019
    ...remains child-centred, and not parent-centred, the “happy parent-happy child” factor may properly form part of the analysis: A.L. v M.L., 2019 SKCA 61 at para [42] Of course, in the context of an appeal, the trial judge’s application of the relevant legal principles must be assessed through......
  • Tyacke v Tyacke,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 20 May 2021
    ...The standard of appellate review in relation to property division was expressed in these terms in A.L. v M.L., 2019 SKCA 61, 29 RFL (8th) 89: [53] … The valuation of assets for division of family property purposes and determinations of what constitutes a fair and equitable division o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
  • PRIME v. PRIME, 2020 SKQB 326
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 8 December 2020
    ...happiness is to be considered on this type of application. However, this does not trump all other considerations. In A.L. v M.L., 2019 SKCA 61, 29 RFL (8th) 89, Schwann J.A. 35 The final part of A.L.’s mobility argument is her assertion the trial judge failed to give effect to the &#......
  • TYACKE v TYACKE, 2019 SKQB 271
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 25 October 2019
    ...2007 SCC 17, [2007] 1 SCR 795 [Pecore]. This position, however, is not consistent with the jurisprudence in Saskatchewan: A.L. v M.L, 2019 SKCA 61; Hilmoe v Hilmoe, 2018 SKCA 92, 16 RFL (8th) 288 [Hilmoe]; and Dunnison Estate v Dunnison, 2017 SKCA 40 at para 94, [2017] 8 WWR 18 [35] Jackson......
  • Peterson v Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 7 August 2019
    ...remains child-centred, and not parent-centred, the “happy parent-happy child” factor may properly form part of the analysis: A.L. v M.L., 2019 SKCA 61 at para [42] Of course, in the context of an appeal, the trial judge’s application of the relevant legal principles must be assessed through......
  • Tyacke v Tyacke,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 20 May 2021
    ...The standard of appellate review in relation to property division was expressed in these terms in A.L. v M.L., 2019 SKCA 61, 29 RFL (8th) 89: [53] … The valuation of assets for division of family property purposes and determinations of what constitutes a fair and equitable division o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT