A.L. v M.L., 2019 SKCA 61
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Judge | Jackson, Caldwell and Schwann JJ.A. |
Citation | 2019 SKCA 61 |
Docket Number | CACV3100 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
Date | 28 June 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 practice notes
-
PRIME v. PRIME, 2020 SKQB 326
...happiness is to be considered on this type of application. However, this does not trump all other considerations. In A.L. v M.L., 2019 SKCA 61, 29 RFL (8th) 89, Schwann J.A. 35 The final part of A.L.’s mobility argument is her assertion the trial judge failed to give effect to the ......
-
TYACKE v TYACKE, 2019 SKQB 271
...2007 SCC 17, [2007] 1 SCR 795 [Pecore]. This position, however, is not consistent with the jurisprudence in Saskatchewan: A.L. v M.L, 2019 SKCA 61; Hilmoe v Hilmoe, 2018 SKCA 92, 16 RFL (8th) 288 [Hilmoe]; and Dunnison Estate v Dunnison, 2017 SKCA 40 at para 94, [2017] 8 WWR 18 [35] Jackson......
-
Peterson v Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76
...remains child-centred, and not parent-centred, the “happy parent-happy child” factor may properly form part of the analysis: A.L. v M.L., 2019 SKCA 61 at para [42] Of course, in the context of an appeal, the trial judge’s application of the relevant legal principles must be assessed through......
-
Tyacke v Tyacke,
...The standard of appellate review in relation to property division was expressed in these terms in A.L. v M.L., 2019 SKCA 61, 29 RFL (8th) 89: [53] … The valuation of assets for division of family property purposes and determinations of what constitutes a fair and equitable division o......
Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
-
PRIME v. PRIME, 2020 SKQB 326
...happiness is to be considered on this type of application. However, this does not trump all other considerations. In A.L. v M.L., 2019 SKCA 61, 29 RFL (8th) 89, Schwann J.A. 35 The final part of A.L.’s mobility argument is her assertion the trial judge failed to give effect to the ......
-
TYACKE v TYACKE, 2019 SKQB 271
...2007 SCC 17, [2007] 1 SCR 795 [Pecore]. This position, however, is not consistent with the jurisprudence in Saskatchewan: A.L. v M.L, 2019 SKCA 61; Hilmoe v Hilmoe, 2018 SKCA 92, 16 RFL (8th) 288 [Hilmoe]; and Dunnison Estate v Dunnison, 2017 SKCA 40 at para 94, [2017] 8 WWR 18 [35] Jackson......
-
Peterson v Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76
...remains child-centred, and not parent-centred, the “happy parent-happy child” factor may properly form part of the analysis: A.L. v M.L., 2019 SKCA 61 at para [42] Of course, in the context of an appeal, the trial judge’s application of the relevant legal principles must be assessed through......
-
Tyacke v Tyacke,
...The standard of appellate review in relation to property division was expressed in these terms in A.L. v M.L., 2019 SKCA 61, 29 RFL (8th) 89: [53] … The valuation of assets for division of family property purposes and determinations of what constitutes a fair and equitable division o......
Request a trial to view additional results