Labbe v. Labbe, [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 835

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHalfyard, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Citation[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 835,[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 835 (SC),2009 BCSC 835
Date23 June 2009
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 practice notes
  • Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 July 2022
    ...are not “support orders” within the meaning of the Divorce Act, see Gill-Sager v Sager, [2003] BCJ No 121 (CA). Compare Labbe v Labbe, 2009 BCSC 835. For an excellent judicial summary of the principles to be applied where interim spousal support is being sought, see Anand v Anand, 2016 ABCA......
  • Spousal Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Seventh Edition
    • 29 August 2017
    ...are not “support orders” within the meaning of the Divorce Act , see Gill-Sager v Sager , [2003] BCJ No 121 (CA). Compare Labbe v Labbe , 2009 BCSC 835. 7 Gill-Sager v Sager , [2003] BCJ No 121 (CA); see also BGD v RWD , [2003] BCJ No 1098 (CA). Compare Tierney-Hynes v Hynes , [2005] OJ No ......
  • Spousal Support On or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Fifth Edition
    • 29 August 2013
    ...are not “support orders” within the meaning of the Divorce Act , see Gill-Sager v Sager , [2003] BCJ No 121 (CA). Compare Labbe v Labbe , 2009 BCSC 835. 6 Gill-Sager v Sager , ibid ; see also BGD v RWD , [2003] BCJ No 1098 (CA). Compare TierneyHynes v Hynes , [2005] OJ No 2661 (CA). c anadi......
  • Spousal Support On or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Fourth Edition
    • 8 September 2011
    ...“support orders” within the meaning of the Divorce Act , see Gill-Sager v. Sager , [2003] B.C.J. No. 121 (C.A.). Compare Labbe v. Labbe , 2009 BCSC 835. 5 Gill-Sager v. Sager , ibid. ; see also B.G.D. v. R.W.D. , [2003] B.C.J. No. 1098 (C.A.). Compare Tierney-Hynes v. Hynes , [2005] O.J. No......
  • Get Started for Free
2 cases
  • R. v. Kleykens, 2020 NSCA 49
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 24 June 2020
    ...extent of Mr. Kleykens’ drug trafficking operation. And so are we. See for example, R. v. J.N., 2019 NLCA 65 at ¶22-25; R. v. Tkachuk, 2009 BCSC 835 at ¶13 and ¶19; R. v. Evaglok, 2010 NWTCA 12 at ¶14; R. v. Meisner (1981), 46 N.S.R. (2d) 456 (NSCA) at ¶4-5; and R. v. Knittel, [1983] S.J. N......
  • Kesselman v. Kesselman, [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 146 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 20 January 2014
    ...received in the twilight of their marriage. Counsel relies on Anderson v. Anderson , 1996 CarswellBC 2271 (S.C.), and Labbe v. Labbe , 2009 BCSC 835 . In those cases the court allowed certain money which had been inherited by one party to be reapportioned. [19] Ms. Kesselman opposes any suc......
6 books & journal articles
  • Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 July 2022
    ...are not “support orders” within the meaning of the Divorce Act, see Gill-Sager v Sager, [2003] BCJ No 121 (CA). Compare Labbe v Labbe, 2009 BCSC 835. For an excellent judicial summary of the principles to be applied where interim spousal support is being sought, see Anand v Anand, 2016 ABCA......
  • Spousal Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Seventh Edition
    • 29 August 2017
    ...are not “support orders” within the meaning of the Divorce Act , see Gill-Sager v Sager , [2003] BCJ No 121 (CA). Compare Labbe v Labbe , 2009 BCSC 835. 7 Gill-Sager v Sager , [2003] BCJ No 121 (CA); see also BGD v RWD , [2003] BCJ No 1098 (CA). Compare Tierney-Hynes v Hynes , [2005] OJ No ......
  • Spousal Support On or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Fifth Edition
    • 29 August 2013
    ...are not “support orders” within the meaning of the Divorce Act , see Gill-Sager v Sager , [2003] BCJ No 121 (CA). Compare Labbe v Labbe , 2009 BCSC 835. 6 Gill-Sager v Sager , ibid ; see also BGD v RWD , [2003] BCJ No 1098 (CA). Compare TierneyHynes v Hynes , [2005] OJ No 2661 (CA). c anadi......
  • Spousal Support On or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Fourth Edition
    • 8 September 2011
    ...“support orders” within the meaning of the Divorce Act , see Gill-Sager v. Sager , [2003] B.C.J. No. 121 (C.A.). Compare Labbe v. Labbe , 2009 BCSC 835. 5 Gill-Sager v. Sager , ibid. ; see also B.G.D. v. R.W.D. , [2003] B.C.J. No. 1098 (C.A.). Compare Tierney-Hynes v. Hynes , [2005] O.J. No......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT