Labbe v. Labbe, [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 835

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHalfyard, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterFAMILY LAW,PRACTICE
Citation[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 835,[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 835 (SC),2009 BCSC 835
Date23 June 2009
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...are not “support orders” within the meaning of the Divorce Act, see Gill-Sager v Sager, [2003] BCJ No 121 (CA). Compare Labbe v Labbe, 2009 BCSC 835. For an excellent judicial summary of the principles to be applied where interim spousal support is being sought, see Anand v Anand, 2016 ABCA......
  • Spousal Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • August 3, 2020
    ...are not “support orders” within the meaning of the Divorce Act, see Gill-Sager v Sager, [2003] BCJ No 121 (CA). Compare Labbe v Labbe, 2009 BCSC 835. For an excellent judicial summary of the principles to be applied where interim spousal support is being sought, see Anand v Anand, 2016 ABCA......
  • R. v. Kleykens, 2020 NSCA 49
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • June 24, 2020
    ...extent of Mr. Kleykens’ drug trafficking operation. And so are we. See for example, R. v. J.N., 2019 NLCA 65 at ¶22-25; R. v. Tkachuk, 2009 BCSC 835 at ¶13 and ¶19; R. v. Evaglok, 2010 NWTCA 12 at ¶14; R. v. Meisner (1981), 46 N.S.R. (2d) 456 (NSCA) at ¶4-5; and R. v. Knittel, [1983] S.J. N......
  • Kesselman v. Kesselman, [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 146 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 20, 2014
    ...received in the twilight of their marriage. Counsel relies on Anderson v. Anderson , 1996 CarswellBC 2271 (S.C.), and Labbe v. Labbe , 2009 BCSC 835 . In those cases the court allowed certain money which had been inherited by one party to be reapportioned. [19] Ms. Kesselman opposes any suc......
2 cases
  • R. v. Kleykens, 2020 NSCA 49
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • June 24, 2020
    ...extent of Mr. Kleykens’ drug trafficking operation. And so are we. See for example, R. v. J.N., 2019 NLCA 65 at ¶22-25; R. v. Tkachuk, 2009 BCSC 835 at ¶13 and ¶19; R. v. Evaglok, 2010 NWTCA 12 at ¶14; R. v. Meisner (1981), 46 N.S.R. (2d) 456 (NSCA) at ¶4-5; and R. v. Knittel, [1983] S.J. N......
  • Kesselman v. Kesselman, [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 146 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 20, 2014
    ...received in the twilight of their marriage. Counsel relies on Anderson v. Anderson , 1996 CarswellBC 2271 (S.C.), and Labbe v. Labbe , 2009 BCSC 835 . In those cases the court allowed certain money which had been inherited by one party to be reapportioned. [19] Ms. Kesselman opposes any suc......
2 books & journal articles
  • Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...are not “support orders” within the meaning of the Divorce Act, see Gill-Sager v Sager, [2003] BCJ No 121 (CA). Compare Labbe v Labbe, 2009 BCSC 835. For an excellent judicial summary of the principles to be applied where interim spousal support is being sought, see Anand v Anand, 2016 ABCA......
  • Spousal Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • August 3, 2020
    ...are not “support orders” within the meaning of the Divorce Act, see Gill-Sager v Sager, [2003] BCJ No 121 (CA). Compare Labbe v Labbe, 2009 BCSC 835. For an excellent judicial summary of the principles to be applied where interim spousal support is being sought, see Anand v Anand, 2016 ABCA......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT