Lapaix v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2025 FC 111 |
| Date | 20 January 2025 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
11 practice notes
-
Rio Tinto Iron and Titanium Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General)
...2020 SCC 22 at paras 34–41, Gordillo v Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FCA 23 at para 112; Lapaix v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 111 at paras 42–44); especially since, in this case, the evidence shows that there have been failures to comply with the Act and the MDMER for se......
-
Zahrebelnyi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1338
...makers are not entitled to rely on ambiguous, suspect, or unverifiable information (Lapaix v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 111 at para 44). Nevertheless, administrative decision makers are tasked with assigning weight to evidence, rather than reviewing courts (Vavilov at par......
-
Ali v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2025 FC 1682
...to narrow down the relevant organization for the purposes of section 34: see, for example, Lapaix v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 111 Responsibility of the organization: When the wrongful acts were ordered by the leaders of the organization, the latter’s accountability is no......
-
Chauhan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 1998 CanLII 8667 (FC) at para 17; Lapaix v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 111 at para [16] In this case, the new evidence marshalled by the Applicants directly touched upon the means and motivation of the gangsters to pursue......
Get Started for Free
11 cases
-
Rio Tinto Iron and Titanium Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General)
...2020 SCC 22 at paras 34–41, Gordillo v Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FCA 23 at para 112; Lapaix v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 111 at paras 42–44); especially since, in this case, the evidence shows that there have been failures to comply with the Act and the MDMER for se......
-
Ali v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2025 FC 1682
...to narrow down the relevant organization for the purposes of section 34: see, for example, Lapaix v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 111 Responsibility of the organization: When the wrongful acts were ordered by the leaders of the organization, the latter’s accountability is no......
-
Zahrebelnyi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1338
...makers are not entitled to rely on ambiguous, suspect, or unverifiable information (Lapaix v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 111 at para 44). Nevertheless, administrative decision makers are tasked with assigning weight to evidence, rather than reviewing courts (Vavilov at par......
-
Chauhan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 1998 CanLII 8667 (FC) at para 17; Lapaix v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 111 at para [16] In this case, the new evidence marshalled by the Applicants directly touched upon the means and motivation of the gangsters to pursue......
Get Started for Free
