Latham v Her Majesty the Queen, 2018 ABQB 69
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice John T. Henderson |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Case Date | Wednesday January 31, 2018 |
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Citations | 2018 ABQB 69 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
29 practice notes
-
Getschel v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ABQB 409
...common and futile litigation with a document based Accelerated Habeas Corpus Review Procedure: Latham v Her Majesty the Queen, 2018 ABQB 69; Latham v Alberta, 2018 ABQB 141. [63] Elevated cost awards (Loughlin v Her Majesty the Queen, 2018 ABQB 45) and court access restrictions (Ewanchuk v ......
-
Unrau v National Dental Examining Board,
...ABQB 464. This Court responded to that extremely damaging litigation with the “Accelerated Habeas Corpus Review Procedure” (R v Latham, 2018 ABQB 69, 72 Alta LR (6th) 357, application dismissed 2018 ABQB 141, costs ordered 2018 ABQB 329). That process is, in many senses, a precursor to the ......
-
Heiser v Bowden Institution, 2018 ABQB 244
...corpus applications in a timely, just, efficient, and proportionate matter. The Procedure is detailed in Latham v Her Majesty the Queen, 2018 ABQB 69 [Latham [4] In brief, the Procedure responds to Rule 3.68 applications where the Court concludes that either the respondent state actor or th......
-
Kelleher v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads), 2021 ABQB 517
...approach has previously been engaged in response to substantially defective habeas corpus Applications (Latham v Her Majesty the Queen, 2018 ABQB 69, habeas corpus Application struck out 2018 ABQB 141, aff’d 2018 ABCA 267, leave to appeal at SCC refused, 38437 (14 March 2019)), and apparent......
Get Started for Free
29 cases
-
Getschel v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ABQB 409
...common and futile litigation with a document based Accelerated Habeas Corpus Review Procedure: Latham v Her Majesty the Queen, 2018 ABQB 69; Latham v Alberta, 2018 ABQB 141. [63] Elevated cost awards (Loughlin v Her Majesty the Queen, 2018 ABQB 45) and court access restrictions (Ewanchuk v ......
-
Wilcox v Alberta, 2019 ABQB 201
...their substance. This process was formerly conducted via the Accelerated Habeas Corpus Review Procedure ( Latham v Her Majesty the Queen, 2018 ABQB 69, 72 Alta LR (6th) 357), and now under Civil Practice Note No. 7 [CPN7] ( Unrau v National Dental Examining Board, 2018 ABQB 874 [ Unrau #1])......
-
Latham (Re), 2018 ABQB 522
...comprehensive, and expert procedure: Lee v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ABQB 40 at paras 146-151; Latham v Her Majesty the Queen, 2018 ABQB 69 at paras 39-42, confirmed 2018 ABQB 141 at paras 28-30; Boviz v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ABQB 110 at paras 39-44, confirmed 2018 AB......
-
Unrau v National Dental Examining Board,
...ABQB 464. This Court responded to that extremely damaging litigation with the “Accelerated Habeas Corpus Review Procedure” (R v Latham, 2018 ABQB 69, 72 Alta LR (6th) 357, application dismissed 2018 ABQB 141, costs ordered 2018 ABQB 329). That process is, in many senses, a precursor to the ......
Get Started for Free