Lay v Lay, 2019 ABCA 21
| Judge | Patricia Rowbotham,Thomas W. Wakeling,Michelle Crighton |
| Citation | 2019 ABCA 21 |
| Date | 22 January 2019 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Docket Number | 1701-0057-AC |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
15 practice notes
-
Hannam v Medicine Hat School District No. 76
...2018 ABQB 515 63 Khalil v. Durant judgment granted 2018 ABQB 17 granted 2018 ABQB 473 64 Lay v. Lay dismissal granted 2017 ABQB 29 granted 2019 ABCA 21 65 Lee v. Hache dismissal granted 2018 ABQB 88 66 LNR v. Moutview Pharma Corp. dismissal denied 2017 ABQB 137 denied 2017 ABQB 730 67 Monta......
-
Glamorgan Landing Estates GP Inc. v Calgary (City)
...Wakeling & Greckol, JJ.A. (“Reference must be had to reputable dictionaries to discover the ordinary meanings of words”); Lay v. Lay, 2019 ABCA 21, ¶ 63; [2019] 2 W.W.R. 254, 275, leave to appeal ref'd, [2019] S.C.C.A. No. 85 per Wakeling, J.A. (“Dictionaries compile the ordinary meanin......
-
Remington Development Corporation v Canadian Pacific Railway Company
...meanings from which the court must select the most suitable for the context”), leave to appeal ref'd, [2017] 2 S.C.R. vii; Lay v. Lay, 2019 ABCA 21, ¶ 63; [2019] 2 W.W.R. 254, 275 per Wakeling, J.A. (“Dictionaries compile the ordinary meaning of words that those who use a language correctly......
-
Bruno v Samson Cree Nation, 2021 ABCA 381
...claim can raise if it wishes to, but which the defendant is not obliged to raise if it does not wish”). [143] E.g., Lay v. Lay, 2019 ABCA 21; [2019] 2 W.W.R. 294, leave to appeal ref’d, [2019] S.C.C.A. No. 85 (the Court upheld an order summarily dismissing the plaintiff’......
Get Started for Free
14 cases
-
Hannam v Medicine Hat School District No. 76
...2018 ABQB 515 63 Khalil v. Durant judgment granted 2018 ABQB 17 granted 2018 ABQB 473 64 Lay v. Lay dismissal granted 2017 ABQB 29 granted 2019 ABCA 21 65 Lee v. Hache dismissal granted 2018 ABQB 88 66 LNR v. Moutview Pharma Corp. dismissal denied 2017 ABQB 137 denied 2017 ABQB 730 67 Monta......
-
Glamorgan Landing Estates GP Inc. v Calgary (City)
...Wakeling & Greckol, JJ.A. (“Reference must be had to reputable dictionaries to discover the ordinary meanings of words”); Lay v. Lay, 2019 ABCA 21, ¶ 63; [2019] 2 W.W.R. 254, 275, leave to appeal ref'd, [2019] S.C.C.A. No. 85 per Wakeling, J.A. (“Dictionaries compile the ordinary meanin......
-
Remington Development Corporation v Canadian Pacific Railway Company
...meanings from which the court must select the most suitable for the context”), leave to appeal ref'd, [2017] 2 S.C.R. vii; Lay v. Lay, 2019 ABCA 21, ¶ 63; [2019] 2 W.W.R. 254, 275 per Wakeling, J.A. (“Dictionaries compile the ordinary meaning of words that those who use a language correctly......
-
Bruno v Samson Cree Nation, 2021 ABCA 381
...claim can raise if it wishes to, but which the defendant is not obliged to raise if it does not wish”). [143] E.g., Lay v. Lay, 2019 ABCA 21; [2019] 2 W.W.R. 294, leave to appeal ref’d, [2019] S.C.C.A. No. 85 (the Court upheld an order summarily dismissing the plaintiff’......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
The Evolution Of The Test For Summary Judgment: Old Habits Die Hard
...Rotzang panel, quoted the earlier cases that noted the moving party's position must be unassailable. On January 22, 2019, in Lay v Lay, 2019 ABCA 21, the majority of the Court upheld the dismissal of a plaintiff's action and did not cite either Stefanyk or Rotzang. Justice Wakeling (also on......