Laying the Groundwork for Conflict, 1891-92
Author | C. Ian Kyer |
Pages | 15-30 |
Chapter
LAYINGTHEGROUNDWORK
FORCONFLICT
EdwardFrederickNedClarkeandtheth irtynine
aldermen who made up the Toronto city council were much concerned ab out
theCit ystransitsystemThe thirt yyearfranchise of thedetested Toronto
Street Railway Company (TSR) was coming to a close. There was no doubt
that the TSR had to be replaced, but determining what ought to replace it
occupiedaverylargepartoftheiragendaAStreetRai lwayCommieehad
been formed to hold hearings and consider whether the City itself ought to
assume ownership and operation, or grant a new franch ise to another pri
vate sector company. Transit was increasingly important because the City
hadgrow nsubsta ntiallya ndnow had apopulation of morethan
Much oft hat growth was from the an nexation ofs urrounding commun
itiesYorkvilleinRiverdaleandBrocktonintheAnnexin
Seato nVil lagei na ndParkd alei nAs Jesse Middl etonwo uldlat er
writeTorontonolongerfou nditself acompactlile citybuta straggling
big one, outgrowing its civic services as rapidly as a small boy outgrows his
pa nta lo ons Moving aboutth iseverexpandi ngcity was noteasy Streets
were unpavedwit h the dust kept down byst reet sprinklers a horse
drawn half cistern mounted on t wo big axles with a tube across the back
from which water was spread onto the dirt roadway.Thewelltodotra
versed these roads in their car riages, but the working class had to walk or
takethe horsedrawnstre etcarsoft heTSRSome formofimprovedt ransit
AThirtyYearsWar
systemwas neededto servethe expanding cityand tobeer getpeople to
their jobs in the central core.
MayorClarkek newthe importance oft ransita ndthe diculties ofef
fectingc hangeHewouldsoon beseek inghis fourthoneyearter mint hat
oceelections were then held each JanuaryHe was very much apolit
ician even while mayorhe wassii ngin opposition as aCon servative
MPPin the provincial legislature He owed both positions to the fact that
hewasa prominentmember ofthe OrangeOrder infacthe hadbeen the
founder and publisher of the Ora nge Sent inel, wh ich was considered to be
the voice of the group).AsaCity politicianhewasknownforh isnancial
and administrative reforms. That reform program explains in part why he
wascommiedtoending themonopolyheldbytheTorontoStreetRa ilway
Company and why his enthusiasm for the establishment of a publicly owned
and operated transit system was rapidly growing.
Clarke’s growing enthusiasm for a publicly run transit system was shared
by many people in Toronto; however, not all of those people could vote. As
one commentator on civic government then wrote, Canadian municipalities
wereregardedasaspeciesofjointstoc kcompanyonlythosecontributing
thecapital beingal lowedtoshare int hedirec tionofits aairs Thus, the
vote was only given to men and unmarried women who owned or rented
aproper ty with an assessed value ofat least orwho had an income
over that amount. This meant that many users of the t ransit system had no
meaningful say in the maernevert helessa number of those who could
vote favoured some form of public ownership. Even Clarke’s opponent in the
comingmayoraltyracerealestatedeveloperandfourtimealdermanErnest
AMacdonaldhaditunderconsiderationMacdonaldwasoftheviewthat
itwould be abig mista keto grant another thir tyyeartran sitfranc hise to
theprivatesectorwithoutthe Cityatleastaemptingtooperatet hesystem
itselfHesuggestedhavingaCityappointedcommieeoperatetransitfora
year or two as an experiment — if nothi ng else, it would allow the City to
learn the true value of the fra nchise. To his mind, even a poorly operated
transit system would be preferable to selling the franch ise before its true
value was dete rmined.
The public sentiment was reected by a lively meeting on the Stre et
RailwayQuestionheldinearlyJanuaryBetweent woandth reehu n
dredpeople aendedtheme etingat StAndrews Hallto discuss the issue
The meeting had been ca lled with the support of the mayor, but neither he
noranyalder menaendedW hilet hiswasnot editdidnotdet erthosewh o
To continue reading
Request your trial