Layton v. Layton, (1973) 6 N.B.R.(2d) 68 (CA)
Judge | Limerick, Bugold and Ryan, JJ.A. |
Court | Court of Appeal (New Brunswick) |
Case Date | June 21, 1968 |
Jurisdiction | New Brunswick |
Citations | (1973), 6 N.B.R.(2d) 68 (CA) |
Layton v. Layton (1973), 6 N.B.R.(2d) 68 (CA);
6 R.N.-B.(2e) 68
MLB headnote and full text
Sommaire et texte intégral
Layton v. Layton
Indexed As: Layton v. Layton
Répertorié: Layton v. Layton
New Brunswick Court of Appeal
Limerick, Bugold and Ryan, JJ.A.
January 30, 1973.
Summary:
Résumé:
This case arose out of an application by a mother for the custody of her three year old son. The mother and the father were separated. The separation was the result of an adulterous relationship between the mother and another man. At the time of the application the mother was caring for the boy in Montreal where she worked as a secretary. The court reviewed the father's ability to care for the child and also the father's unsatisfactory history in the past of caring for the child. The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench awarded custody to the mother with access to the father. The judgment of the Court of Queen's Bench is set out below immediately following the New Brunswick Court of Appeal judgment.
The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal and affirmed the judgment of the Court of Queen's Bench.
Family Law - Topic 1881
Custody - Considerations in awarding custody of a three year old boy - Welfare of child - Mother and father separated - The New Brunswick Court of Appeal awarded custody of the boy to the mother.
Cases Noticed:
Philpott v. Philpott, [1954] O.R. 120 (Ont. C.A.), folld.
Re Orr, [1933] O.R. 212 (Ont. C.A.), folld.
Re Armstrong (1895), 1 N.B.R. Eq. 208, folld.
Grandy, Re Oland (1938), 13 M.P.R. 192 (N.B.), folld.
Bickley v. Bickley, [1957] S.C.R. 329, folld.
Bradbury v. Bradbury (1953 54), 10 W.W.R.(N.S.) 366 (B.C.C.A.), folld.
Firlotte v. Firlotte (N.B.C.A.) June 21, 1968, folld.
Re Hudson, 68 D.L.R.(2d) 191, folld.
Statutes Noticed:
Rules of Court, Order 56, rule 10, rule 11.
Counsel:
Douglas C. Ellisworth, for the respondent, appellant;
Wendell Maxwell, for the petitioner, respondent.
The judgment of the court was delivered by Bugold, J.A.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Levesque v. Levesque, (1983) 46 N.B.R.(2d) 184 (CA)
...621; 20 N.R. 203, appld. [para. 5]. Oakes v. Oakes (1975), 11 N.B.R.(2d) 170; 7 A.P.R. 170, ref'd to. [para. 9]. Layton v. Layton (1973), 6 N.B.R.(2d) 68, ref'd to. [para. Digiacinto v. Digiacinto (1975), 9 N.B.R.(2d) 604; 1 A.P.R. 604, ref'd to. [para. 9]. Fullerton v. Fullerton (1980), 31......
-
Cummings v. Cummings, (1975) 12 N.B.R.(2d) 153 (QB)
...that the mother's conduct did not deprive her of custody of the child - See paragraphs 6, 7 and 8. Cases Noticed: Layton v. Layton (1973), 6 N.B.R.(2d) 68, refd to. [para. Pollard v. Pollard (1974), 7 N.B.R.(2d) 120, refd to. [para. 6]. Haughn v. Haughn (1974), 8 N.B.R.(2d) 428, refd to. [p......
-
Pollard v. Pollard, (1973) 7 N.B.R.(2d) 120 (CA)
...for custody of children a separation agreement should be disregarded - See paragraphs 50 and 66. Cases Noticed: Layton v. Layton (1973), 6 N.B.R.(2d) 68, dist. [para. Weeks v. Weeks, [1955] 3 D.L.R. 704, dist. [para. 40]. Hudson v. Hudson (1968), 68 D.L.R.(2d) 191, folld. [paras. 43, 54 and......
-
Haughn v. Haughn, (1974) 8 N.B.R.(2d) 428 (CA)
...to pay $250.00 monthly for the support of his 2 children, aged 6 and 3 - See paragraphs 29 and 31. Cases Noticed: Layton v. Layton, 6 N.B.R.(2d) 68, folld. [para. Pollard v. Pollard, 7 N.B.R.(2d) 120, dist. [para. 8]. Rennie v. Rennie (1973), 11 R.F.L. 278, folld. [para. 11]. Counsel: Dougl......
-
Levesque v. Levesque, (1983) 46 N.B.R.(2d) 184 (CA)
...621; 20 N.R. 203, appld. [para. 5]. Oakes v. Oakes (1975), 11 N.B.R.(2d) 170; 7 A.P.R. 170, ref'd to. [para. 9]. Layton v. Layton (1973), 6 N.B.R.(2d) 68, ref'd to. [para. Digiacinto v. Digiacinto (1975), 9 N.B.R.(2d) 604; 1 A.P.R. 604, ref'd to. [para. 9]. Fullerton v. Fullerton (1980), 31......
-
Cummings v. Cummings, (1975) 12 N.B.R.(2d) 153 (QB)
...that the mother's conduct did not deprive her of custody of the child - See paragraphs 6, 7 and 8. Cases Noticed: Layton v. Layton (1973), 6 N.B.R.(2d) 68, refd to. [para. Pollard v. Pollard (1974), 7 N.B.R.(2d) 120, refd to. [para. 6]. Haughn v. Haughn (1974), 8 N.B.R.(2d) 428, refd to. [p......
-
Pollard v. Pollard, (1973) 7 N.B.R.(2d) 120 (CA)
...for custody of children a separation agreement should be disregarded - See paragraphs 50 and 66. Cases Noticed: Layton v. Layton (1973), 6 N.B.R.(2d) 68, dist. [para. Weeks v. Weeks, [1955] 3 D.L.R. 704, dist. [para. 40]. Hudson v. Hudson (1968), 68 D.L.R.(2d) 191, folld. [paras. 43, 54 and......
-
Haughn v. Haughn, (1974) 8 N.B.R.(2d) 428 (CA)
...to pay $250.00 monthly for the support of his 2 children, aged 6 and 3 - See paragraphs 29 and 31. Cases Noticed: Layton v. Layton, 6 N.B.R.(2d) 68, folld. [para. Pollard v. Pollard, 7 N.B.R.(2d) 120, dist. [para. 8]. Rennie v. Rennie (1973), 11 R.F.L. 278, folld. [para. 11]. Counsel: Dougl......