LC v Alberta, 2020 ABQB 164
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice Robert A. Graesser |
| Citation | 2020 ABQB 164 |
| Date | 04 March 2020 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 0703 10836 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
LC v Alberta (Child Welfare),
...each sought the removal of the other from the action. [10] My decision at 2020 ABQB 164 dated March 4, 2020, declined to remove either from the file and observed that nothing was likely to occur in the litigation until 2021 after E......
-
LC v Alberta,
...she could participate in the application to remove Mr. Tinkler as her litigation representative, amongst other remedies. In my decision (2020 ABQB 164), I noted at paras [46] At paragraph 63, Mr. Lee states: ......
-
LC v Alberta,
...in the litigation since the leave application was decided in November 2018, but for applications in early 2020 for further advance costs (2020 ABQB 164). [29] Mr. Lee and Mr. Tinkler disagree on the reasons for the demise of their ......
3 cases
-
LC v Alberta (Child Welfare),
...each sought the removal of the other from the action. [10] My decision at 2020 ABQB 164 dated March 4, 2020, declined to remove either from the file and observed that nothing was likely to occur in the litigation until 2021 after E......
-
LC v Alberta,
...she could participate in the application to remove Mr. Tinkler as her litigation representative, amongst other remedies. In my decision (2020 ABQB 164), I noted at paras [46] At paragraph 63, Mr. Lee states: ......
-
LC v Alberta,
...in the litigation since the leave application was decided in November 2018, but for applications in early 2020 for further advance costs (2020 ABQB 164). [29] Mr. Lee and Mr. Tinkler disagree on the reasons for the demise of their ......