Lemelin v. Canada (Attorney General)
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 286 |
| Date | 12 March 2018 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
Dayfallah v. Canada (Attorney General)
...for the Commission’s interpretation and application of section 69 of the PSEA is reasonableness: Lemelin v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 286 at para 41 [Lemelin], per Gagné J. The Federal Court of Appeal has confirmed reasonableness is the standard of review for decisions of a tribunal......
-
Cadostin v. Canada (Attorney General)
...is demanding, as a person’s right to continue his or her employment is at stake (Seck at para 57; Lemelin v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 286 [Lemelin] at para 43). Therefore, an allegation of fraud in the context of an appointment process like this one requires a fairly high level of ......
-
Singh v. Canada (Senate)
...to continue their employment is at stake, “a high standard of justice is required” (Lemelin v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 286, citing Kane v Bd of Governors of UBC, 1980 CanLII 10 (SCC), [1980] 1 SCR 1105 at page 1113; see also Dayfallah v. Canada (Attorney General), 2......
-
Cadostin v. Canada (Attorney General)
...for fraud which requires a fairly high level of procedural fairness (Seck, above; Dayfallah, above; Lemelin v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 286 (Lemelin)). The Respondent argues that Mr. Cadostin was made aware of the case against him and was involved fairly in the investigative proces......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
Dayfallah v. Canada (Attorney General)
...for the Commission’s interpretation and application of section 69 of the PSEA is reasonableness: Lemelin v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 286 at para 41 [Lemelin], per Gagné J. The Federal Court of Appeal has confirmed reasonableness is the standard of review for decisions of a tribunal......
-
Cadostin v. Canada (Attorney General)
...is demanding, as a person’s right to continue his or her employment is at stake (Seck at para 57; Lemelin v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 286 [Lemelin] at para 43). Therefore, an allegation of fraud in the context of an appointment process like this one requires a fairly high level of ......
-
Singh v. Canada (Senate)
...to continue their employment is at stake, “a high standard of justice is required” (Lemelin v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 286, citing Kane v Bd of Governors of UBC, 1980 CanLII 10 (SCC), [1980] 1 SCR 1105 at page 1113; see also Dayfallah v. Canada (Attorney General), 2......
-
Cadostin v. Canada (Attorney General)
...for fraud which requires a fairly high level of procedural fairness (Seck, above; Dayfallah, above; Lemelin v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 286 (Lemelin)). The Respondent argues that Mr. Cadostin was made aware of the case against him and was involved fairly in the investigative proces......
Get Started for Free
