Leopold v. Leopold
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Judge | Wilson, J. |
| Citation | [2000] O.T.C. 868 (SupCt) |
| Date | 06 December 2000 |
Leopold v. Leopold, [2000] O.T.C. 868 (SupCt)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2000] O.T.C. TBEd. DE.024
Hillel Leopold (plaintiff) v. Carole Leopold (defendants)
(Court File No. 97-FA-6302)
Indexed As: Leopold v. Leopold
Court of Ontario
Superior Court of Justice
Wilson, J.
December 6, 2000.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Family Law - Topic 3201
Separation agreements, domestic contracts and marriage contracts - General - Nature of - See paragraphs 102 to 146.
Family Law - Topic 3353
Separation agreements, domestic contracts and marriage contracts - Effect of agreement - In divorce actions - Corollary relief - See paragraphs 146 to 189.
Family Law - Topic 4006
Divorce - Corollary relief - Maintenance and awards - Awards - Effect of agreements - See paragraphs 146 to 189.
Words and Phrases
Unconscionability - The Ontario Superior Court discussed the issue of "unconscionability" in the family law context - See paragraphs 101 to 146.
Cases Noticed:
Santosuosso v. Santosuosso (1997), 97 O.A.C. 42; 27 R.F.L.(4th) 234; 32 O.R.(3d) 143 (Div. Ct.), refd to. [para. 4].
Bailey v. Plaxton, [2000] O.T.C. 243; 47 O.R.(3d) 593 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 4].
Pelech v. Pelech, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 801; 76 N.R. 81; [1987] 4 W.W.R. 481; 7 R.F.L.(3d) 225; 14 B.C.L.R.(2d) 145; 38 D.L.R.(4th) 641; 17 C.P.C.(2d) 1, refd to. [para. 7].
Richardson v. Richardson, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 857; 77 N.R. 1; 22 O.A.C. 1; 7 R.F.L.(3d) 304; 38 D.L.R.(4th) 699; 17 C.P.C.(2d) 104, refd to. [para. 7].
Caron v. Caron, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 892; 75 N.R. 36; 2 Y.R. 246; [1987] 4 W.W.R. 522; 7 R.F.L.(3d) 274; 38 D.L.R.(4th) 735; 14 B.C.L.R.(2d) 186, refd to. [para. 7].
L.G. v. G.B., [1995] 3 S.C.R. 370; 186 N.R. 201; 15 R.F.L.(4th) 201, refd to. [para. 7].
Miglin v. Miglin, [1999] O.T.C. Uned. B61; 3 R.F.L.(5th) 106 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 7].
Larocque v. Larocque (1998), 195 N.B.R.(2d) 161; 499 A.P.R. 161; 36 R.F.L.(4th) 73 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 7].
Farquar v. Farquar (1983), 43 O.R.(2d) 423 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 60].
Carmichael v. Carmichael (1986), 3 R.F.L.(3d) 453 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 60].
Joyce v. Joyce (1984), 4 O.A.C. 395; 47 O.R.(2d) 609 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 60].
Moge v. Moge, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 813; 145 N.R. 1; 81 Man.R.(2d) 161; 30 W.A.C. 161; [1993] 1 W.W.R. 481; 99 D.L.R.(4th) 456; 43 R.F.L.(3d) 345, refd to. [para. 67].
Masters v. Masters, [1994] 1 S.C.R. 883; 168 N.R. 11; 120 Sask.R. 318; 68 W.A.C. 318; 114 D.L.R.(4th) 575; 4 R.F.L.(4th) 1, refd to. [para. 72].
Bracklow v. Bracklow, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 420; 236 N.R. 79; 120 B.C.A.C. 211; 196 W.A.C. 211, refd to. [para. 83].
Bracklow v. Bracklow (1999), 27 B.C.T.C. 58; 3 R.F.L.(5th) 179 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 83].
Puopolo v. Puopolo (1986), 2 R.F.L.(3d) 73 (Ont. H.C.), refd to. [para. 101].
Harwood v. Thomas (1980), 45 N.S.R.(2d) 414; 86 A.P.R. 414 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 101].
Trembath v. Trembath, [1993] O.J. No. 202 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 101].
S.M.B. v. K.R.B. (1997), 32 O.T.C. 161 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 101].
Kelly v. Kelly (1986), 50 R.F.L.(2d) 360 (Ont. H.C.), refd to. [para. 101].
Kelly v. Kelly (1986), 2 R.F.L.(3d) 1 (Ont. S.C.), refd to. [para. 101].
Magee v. Magee (1987), 6 R.F.L.(3d) 453 (Ont. U.F.C.), refd to. [para. 101].
Ashmore v. Ashmore (1996), 12 O.T.C. 23 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 102].
Couzens v. Couzens (1981), 34 O.R.(2d) 87; 24 R.F.L.(2d) 243 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 102].
Lamers v. Lamers and Gunn (1978), 6 R.F.L.(2d) 283 (Ont. H.C.), refd to. [para. 102].
Legg v. Legg, [1993] B.C.J. No. 336 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 102].
Montreuil v. Montreuil, [1999] O.J. No. 4450 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 102].
Lees v. Lees, [2000] O.T.C. 205 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 102].
Murphy v. Murphy (1995), 18 R.F.L.(4th) 107 (Ont. Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 102].
Mundinger v. Mundinger, [1969] 1 O.R. 606 (C.A.), affd. (1970), 14 D.L.R.(3d) 256 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 108].
Deroon v. Deroon (1980), 29 O.R.(2d) 750 (C.A.), refd to. [109].
Zimmer v. Zimmer (1989), 90 N.S.R.(2d) 243; 230 A.P.R. 243 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 116].
Miura v. Miura (1992), 12 B.C.A.C. 278; 23 W.A.C. 278; 40 R.F.L.(3d) 43; 66 B.C.L.R.(2d) 345 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 117].
International Corona Resources Ltd. v. LAC Minerals Ltd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 574; 101 N.R. 239; 36 O.A.C. 57; 61 D.L.R. (4th) 14; 35 E.T.R. 1; 44 B.L.R. 1, refd to. [para. 131].
Wallace v. United Grain Growers Ltd., [1997] 3 S.C.R. 701; 219 N.R. 161; 123 Man.R.(2d) 1; 159 W.A.C. 1; 152 D.L.R.(4th) 1, refd to. [para. 132].
Canadian Bank of Commerce v. Munro, [1925] S.C.R. 302, refd to. [para. 132].
Canadian Aero Services Ltd. v. O'Malley, [1974] S.C.R. 592; 40 D.L.R.(3d) 371, refd to. [para. 132].
Whiten v. Pilot Insurance Co. et al. (1999), 117 O.A.C. 201; 42 O.R.(3d) 641 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 132].
Frame v. Smith and Smith, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 99; 78 N.R. 40; 23 O.A.C. 84, refd to. [para. 136].
Murray v. Murray (1994), 157 A.R. 224; 77 W.A.C. 224; 10 R.F.L.(4th) 60; 119 D.L.R.(4th) 46 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 137].
Underwood v. Underwood (1994), 3 R.F.L.(4th) 457; 113 D.L.R.(4th) 46 (Ont. Gen. Div.), affd. (1995), 11 R.F.L.(4th) 361 (Ont. Div. Ct.), refd to. [para. 137].
Gregoric v. Gregoric (1990), 28 R.F.L.(3d) 419 (Ont. Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 138].
Rosen v. Rosen, [1992] O.J. No. 2068 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 138].
Willick v. Willick, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 670; 173 N.R. 321; 125 Sask.R. 81; 81 W.A.C. 81, refd to. [para. 179].
Currie v. Currie, [1987] 3 W.W.R. 374; 45 Man.R.(2d) 289; 6 R.F.L.(3d) 40 (Q.B. Fam. Div.), refd to. [para. 184].
Francis v. Baker, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 250; 246 N.R. 45; 125 O.A.C. 201; 50 R.F.L.(4th) 228, refd to. [para. 186].
Statutes Noticed:
Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1985 (2nd Supp.), c. 3, sect. 15.2, sect. 17(1) [para. 52].
Authors and Works Noticed:
Eekelaar, J.M., and Katz, S.N., The Resolution of Family Conflict (1984), p. 368 [para. 115].
Payne, J.D., and Payne, M.A., Dealing with Family Law (1993), p. 78 [para. 114].
Shaffer, Martha, Separation Agreements Post-Moge, Willick and L.G. v. G.B.: A New Trilogy? (1999), 16 Can. J. Fam. L. 51-135, pp. 55, 56 [para. 66].
Youdan, T.G., Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts (1989), p. 3 [para. 105].
Counsel:
G.S. Joseph and D. Smith, for the plaintiff;
L. Pawlitza and D. Szandtner, for the defendant.
This matter was heard on June 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, and 16, 2000, by Wilson, J., of the Ontario Superior Court, who delivered the following decision on December 6, 2000.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations