Lewis v. Wang, 2020 BCSC 16
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice Macintosh |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | January 08, 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | 2020 BCSC 16 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 practice notes
-
Nadeau v. Toulmin, 2020 BCSC 866
...of the award. Ms. Nadeau cited Alafianpour-Esfahani v. Jolliffe, 2017 BCSC 701; Beaton; Evans v. Keill, 2018 BCSC 1651; and Lewis v. Wang, 2020 BCSC 16, in support of her submission that the appropriate range for non-pecuniary damages in her case is $100,000 to $120,000. Mr. Toulmin cited P......
-
Bucholtz v. Zhang, 2020 BCSC 571
...plaintiff relies on the following cases: Tang v. Duong, 2020 BCSC 85 ($80,000); Harry v. Powar, 2018 BCSC 845 ($85,000); Lewis v. Wang, 2020 BCSC 16 ($90,000); Pasemko v. Kosolofski, 2020 BCSC 246 ($90,000); Gardner v. Yoo, 2019 BCSC 2230 ($100,000); Carrillo v. Deschutter, 2018 BCSC 2134 [......
-
Williams v. Dolhan, 2020 BCSC 136
...were assessed: Bain v. Goodridge, 2019 BCSC 1450; Leach v. Jesson, 2017 BCSC 577; Dhaliwal v. Meerdink, 2014 BCSC 2418; Lewis v. Wang, 2020 BCSC 16; Dzumhur v. Davoody, 2015 BCSC 2316; Merko v. Plummer, 2016 BCSC 1403; and Ferguson v. Watt, 2018 BCSC 1587. Most of these cases fall into the ......
-
Tang v. Duong, 2020 BCSC 85
...is appropriate, citing Jaehrlich v. Kuechler, 2019 BCSC 1126 ($110,000); Ahonen v. Thauli, 2013 BCSC 1607 ($100,000); Lewis v. Wang, 2020 BCSC 16 ($90,000); and Roemer v. Shafi, 2020 BCSC 1 ($80,000). The defendant submits that $50,000 is the appropriate figure, relying on Matharu v. Gill, ......
Request a trial to view additional results
16 cases
-
Nadeau v. Toulmin, 2020 BCSC 866
...of the award. Ms. Nadeau cited Alafianpour-Esfahani v. Jolliffe, 2017 BCSC 701; Beaton; Evans v. Keill, 2018 BCSC 1651; and Lewis v. Wang, 2020 BCSC 16, in support of her submission that the appropriate range for non-pecuniary damages in her case is $100,000 to $120,000. Mr. Toulmin cited P......
-
Bucholtz v. Zhang, 2020 BCSC 571
...plaintiff relies on the following cases: Tang v. Duong, 2020 BCSC 85 ($80,000); Harry v. Powar, 2018 BCSC 845 ($85,000); Lewis v. Wang, 2020 BCSC 16 ($90,000); Pasemko v. Kosolofski, 2020 BCSC 246 ($90,000); Gardner v. Yoo, 2019 BCSC 2230 ($100,000); Carrillo v. Deschutter, 2018 BCSC 2134 [......
-
Williams v. Dolhan, 2020 BCSC 136
...were assessed: Bain v. Goodridge, 2019 BCSC 1450; Leach v. Jesson, 2017 BCSC 577; Dhaliwal v. Meerdink, 2014 BCSC 2418; Lewis v. Wang, 2020 BCSC 16; Dzumhur v. Davoody, 2015 BCSC 2316; Merko v. Plummer, 2016 BCSC 1403; and Ferguson v. Watt, 2018 BCSC 1587. Most of these cases fall into the ......
-
Tang v. Duong, 2020 BCSC 85
...is appropriate, citing Jaehrlich v. Kuechler, 2019 BCSC 1126 ($110,000); Ahonen v. Thauli, 2013 BCSC 1607 ($100,000); Lewis v. Wang, 2020 BCSC 16 ($90,000); and Roemer v. Shafi, 2020 BCSC 1 ($80,000). The defendant submits that $50,000 is the appropriate figure, relying on Matharu v. Gill, ......
Request a trial to view additional results