Li v. British Columbia, 2019 BCSC 1819
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Bowden |
| Citation | 2019 BCSC 1819 |
| Docket Number | S168644 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Date | 24 October 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Li v. British Columbia,
...Voith On appeal from: An order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, dated October 24, 2019 (Li v. British Columbia, 2019 BCSC 1819, Vancouver Docket S168644). Counsel for the (via videoconference): J.J.M. Arvay, Q.C. D. Wu L. Brasil A. Sharon Counsel......
-
Pantusa v. Parkland Fuel Corporation, 2020 BCSC 1988
...that had the potential, if answered in their favour, to undermine the entire basis of the plaintiffs’ claim. In Li v. British Columbia, 2019 BCSC 1819, it was the constitutional validity of the impugned [39] This is not such a case. Here, there is too much apparent overlap among the certifi......
-
Wittman v. Blackbaud, Inc.,
...by way of summary judgment. [55] That a factual issue may exist distinguishes this case from cases such as Li v. British Columbia, 2019 BCSC 1819 [Li] and Consumers’ Association et al. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company et al., 2005 BCSC 1042 [Coca-Cola] in which summary trial applications were ......
-
Li v. British Columbia, 2020 BCCA 222
...(In Chambers) On appeal from: An order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, dated October 24, 2019 (Li v. British Columbia, 2019 BCSC 1819, Vancouver Docket No. Oral Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Proposed Intervenor, International Commission of Jurists Canada (via teleconference......
4 cases
-
Li v. British Columbia,
...Voith On appeal from: An order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, dated October 24, 2019 (Li v. British Columbia, 2019 BCSC 1819, Vancouver Docket S168644). Counsel for the (via videoconference): J.J.M. Arvay, Q.C. D. Wu L. Brasil A. Sharon Counsel......
-
Pantusa v. Parkland Fuel Corporation, 2020 BCSC 1988
...that had the potential, if answered in their favour, to undermine the entire basis of the plaintiffs’ claim. In Li v. British Columbia, 2019 BCSC 1819, it was the constitutional validity of the impugned [39] This is not such a case. Here, there is too much apparent overlap among the certifi......
-
Wittman v. Blackbaud, Inc.,
...by way of summary judgment. [55] That a factual issue may exist distinguishes this case from cases such as Li v. British Columbia, 2019 BCSC 1819 [Li] and Consumers’ Association et al. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company et al., 2005 BCSC 1042 [Coca-Cola] in which summary trial applications were ......
-
Li v. British Columbia, 2020 BCCA 222
...(In Chambers) On appeal from: An order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, dated October 24, 2019 (Li v. British Columbia, 2019 BCSC 1819, Vancouver Docket No. Oral Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Proposed Intervenor, International Commission of Jurists Canada (via teleconference......