Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Canada | +1 (343) 700 0450

Lin v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 7

Judgment Cited authorities 19 Cited in 2 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeO'Keefe, J.
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Subject MatterIMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,PRACTICE,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Citation[2015] F.T.R. Uned. 7,[2015] F.T.R. Uned. 7 (FC),2015 FC 53
Date15 January 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Huang v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 905
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 21, 2015
    ...F.T.R. Uned. 616 ; 2013 FC 1269 , refd to. [para. 17]. Lin v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 7 ; 2015 FC 53, refd to. [para. Richard Wazana, for the applicant; Rachel Hepburn Craig, for the respondent. Solicitors of Record: WazanaLaw, Toronto, Ontari......
  • Zhang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 502
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 11, 2018
    ...for the interpretation issue is correctness because it is a matter of procedural fairness: Lin v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 53, 249 ACWS (3d) 190. The standard for the cohabitation issue is reasonableness: Dunsmuir v New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9, [2008] 1 SCR 190. A. [16] Th......
2 cases
  • Huang v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 905
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 21, 2015
    ...F.T.R. Uned. 616 ; 2013 FC 1269 , refd to. [para. 17]. Lin v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 7 ; 2015 FC 53, refd to. [para. Richard Wazana, for the applicant; Rachel Hepburn Craig, for the respondent. Solicitors of Record: WazanaLaw, Toronto, Ontari......
  • Zhang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 502
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 11, 2018
    ...for the interpretation issue is correctness because it is a matter of procedural fairness: Lin v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 53, 249 ACWS (3d) 190. The standard for the cohabitation issue is reasonableness: Dunsmuir v New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9, [2008] 1 SCR 190. A. [16] Th......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT