Live! Holdings, LLC v. Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP, 2020 FCA 120
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Court | Court of Appeal (Canada) |
Citation | 2020 FCA 120 |
Date | 14 July 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Blossman Gas, Inc. v. Alliance Autopropane Inc., 2022 FC 1794
...that explicitly provides for the requisite control: Empresa Cubana at para 84; Live! Holdings, LLC v Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP, 2020 FCA 120 at para 24; Caterpillar at para 52. [64] In the case of Caledon, Blossman has provided a copy of a license agreement, namely the Blossman-Cale......
-
IPack B.V. v. McInnes Cooper, 2023 FC 243
...person’s use enures to the owner’s benefit: section 50 of the TMA; Live! Holdings, LLC v Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP, 2020 FCA 120 at para 36 [Live!], citing Empresa Cubana del Tabaco v Shapiro Cohen, 2011 FC 102 at para 84, aff’d 2011 FCA 340; see also Clorox at ......
-
Milano Pizza Ltd. v. 6034799 Canada Inc., 2022 FC 425
...such that MPL would benefit from the deeming provision in the TMA s 50(1): Live! Holdings, LLC v Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP, 2020 FCA 120 at para 36. In other words, the lack of control means that any use, advertisement or display of the Milano Design Mark (and the Milano Word Marks,......
-
RE/MAX, LLC v. Save Max Real Estate Inc., 2022 FC 1268
...Ltd v Living Realty Inc, [2000] 2 FC 501, 1999 CanLII 9394 (FC) at paras 44-45; Live! Holdings, LLC v Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP, 2020 FCA 120 at para 47 (to name but a few Federal Courts decisions in a long line of cases). [27] Further, the Defendants concede on the Rule 51 motion t......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
Blossman Gas, Inc. v. Alliance Autopropane Inc., 2022 FC 1794
...that explicitly provides for the requisite control: Empresa Cubana at para 84; Live! Holdings, LLC v Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP, 2020 FCA 120 at para 24; Caterpillar at para 52. [64] In the case of Caledon, Blossman has provided a copy of a license agreement, namely the Blossman-Cale......
-
IPack B.V. v. McInnes Cooper, 2023 FC 243
...person’s use enures to the owner’s benefit: section 50 of the TMA; Live! Holdings, LLC v Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP, 2020 FCA 120 at para 36 [Live!], citing Empresa Cubana del Tabaco v Shapiro Cohen, 2011 FC 102 at para 84, aff’d 2011 FCA 340; see also Clorox at ......
-
Milano Pizza Ltd. v. 6034799 Canada Inc., 2022 FC 425
...such that MPL would benefit from the deeming provision in the TMA s 50(1): Live! Holdings, LLC v Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP, 2020 FCA 120 at para 36. In other words, the lack of control means that any use, advertisement or display of the Milano Design Mark (and the Milano Word Marks,......
-
RE/MAX, LLC v. Save Max Real Estate Inc., 2022 FC 1268
...Ltd v Living Realty Inc, [2000] 2 FC 501, 1999 CanLII 9394 (FC) at paras 44-45; Live! Holdings, LLC v Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP, 2020 FCA 120 at para 47 (to name but a few Federal Courts decisions in a long line of cases). [27] Further, the Defendants concede on the Rule 51 motion t......
2 firm's commentaries
-
Federal Court of Appeal does not disturb lower court’s finding of 'use' for hotel services
...Inc v Fetherstonhaugh & Co, 2015 FC 1259. 9. Live! Holdings, LLC v Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP, 2019 FC 1042, aff’d on other grounds, 2020 FCA 120. 10. Stikeman Elliott LLP v Millennium & Copthorne International Limited, 2015 TMOB 231; Maillis v Mirage Resorts Inc, 2012 TMOB 11. Hilton Wo......
-
Notable Trademark Decisions In 2020
...of the property or possession of the goods must occur in the normal course of trade. In Live! Holdings LLC v Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala 2020 FCA 120 the Federal Court of Appeal considered the application of section 50(1) of the Trademarks Act which provides that for the Act, if an entity is ......