Lorencz v Talukdar, 2020 SKCA 28
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Leurer,The Honourable Mr. Justice Caldwell,The Honourable Madam Justice Schwann |
Citation | 2020 SKCA 28 |
Docket Number | CACV3187 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
Date | 20 March 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
Regina Bypass Design Builders v Supreme Steel LP,
...in that respect, is reviewable on a correctness standard: Smith v Smith, 2008 SKCA 141 at para 17, [2009] 5 WWR 632; Lorencz v Talukdar, 2020 SKCA 28 at para 51, [2020] 8 WWR 252 [Lorencz]. Statutory Interpretation – The Governing Principles [23] ......
-
STEPHENS v. MLT AIKINS LLP et al,
...sue for economic loss when a family member died from the alleged unlawful act or omission of another. As observed in Lorencz v Talukdar, 2020 SKCA 28 at para 75, 446 DLR (4th) 487, Lord Campbell’s Act was likely received as law in the Northwest Territories before Saskatchewan became ......
-
Manderscheid v Humboldt Smiles Dental Studios Inc.,
...be applied to the interpretation of a statute is correctness: Housen v Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 SCR 235, and Lorencz v Talukdar, 2020 SKCA 28 at para 51, 446 DLR (4th) 487. [21] A determination that privilege exists is a question of mi......
-
Thomas v Quinlan, 2020 SKCA 82
...of law attract the correctness standard of review: Housen v Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 SCR 235 [Housen], and Lorencz v Talukdar, 2020 SKCA 28 at para 51. [29] Mr. Thomas also asserts the Chambers judge erred in both admitting and relying on the transcript of the sentencing hearing. T......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
-
Regina Bypass Design Builders v Supreme Steel LP,
...in that respect, is reviewable on a correctness standard: Smith v Smith, 2008 SKCA 141 at para 17, [2009] 5 WWR 632; Lorencz v Talukdar, 2020 SKCA 28 at para 51, [2020] 8 WWR 252 [Lorencz]. Statutory Interpretation – The Governing Principles [23] ......
-
STEPHENS v. MLT AIKINS LLP et al,
...sue for economic loss when a family member died from the alleged unlawful act or omission of another. As observed in Lorencz v Talukdar, 2020 SKCA 28 at para 75, 446 DLR (4th) 487, Lord Campbell’s Act was likely received as law in the Northwest Territories before Saskatchewan became ......
-
Manderscheid v Humboldt Smiles Dental Studios Inc.,
...be applied to the interpretation of a statute is correctness: Housen v Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 SCR 235, and Lorencz v Talukdar, 2020 SKCA 28 at para 51, 446 DLR (4th) 487. [21] A determination that privilege exists is a question of mi......
-
Thomas v Quinlan, 2020 SKCA 82
...of law attract the correctness standard of review: Housen v Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 SCR 235 [Housen], and Lorencz v Talukdar, 2020 SKCA 28 at para 51. [29] Mr. Thomas also asserts the Chambers judge erred in both admitting and relying on the transcript of the sentencing hearing. T......
Request a trial to view additional results