Lorencz v Talukdar, 2020 SKCA 28

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Leurer,The Honourable Mr. Justice Caldwell,The Honourable Madam Justice Schwann
Citation2020 SKCA 28
Docket NumberCACV3187
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Date20 March 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 practice notes
  • Regina Bypass Design Builders v Supreme Steel LP,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 26 Mayo 2021
    ...in that respect, is reviewable on a correctness standard: Smith v Smith, 2008 SKCA 141 at para 17, [2009] 5 WWR 632; Lorencz v Talukdar, 2020 SKCA 28 at para 51, [2020] 8 WWR 252 [Lorencz]. Statutory Interpretation – The Governing Principles [23]      &#......
  • STEPHENS v. MLT AIKINS LLP et al,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 17 Diciembre 2021
    ...sue for economic loss when a family member died from the alleged unlawful act or omission of another. As observed in Lorencz v Talukdar, 2020 SKCA 28 at para 75, 446 DLR (4th) 487, Lord Campbell’s Act was likely received as law in the Northwest Territories before Saskatchewan became ......
  • Manderscheid v Humboldt Smiles Dental Studios Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 19 Marzo 2021
    ...be applied to the interpretation of a statute is correctness: Housen v Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 SCR 235, and Lorencz v Talukdar, 2020 SKCA 28 at para 51, 446 DLR (4th) 487. [21]        A determination that privilege exists is a question of mi......
  • Thomas v Quinlan, 2020 SKCA 82
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 8 Julio 2020
    ...of law attract the correctness standard of review: Housen v Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 SCR 235 [Housen], and Lorencz v Talukdar, 2020 SKCA 28 at para 51. [29] Mr. Thomas also asserts the Chambers judge erred in both admitting and relying on the transcript of the sentencing hearing. T......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
  • Regina Bypass Design Builders v Supreme Steel LP,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 26 Mayo 2021
    ...in that respect, is reviewable on a correctness standard: Smith v Smith, 2008 SKCA 141 at para 17, [2009] 5 WWR 632; Lorencz v Talukdar, 2020 SKCA 28 at para 51, [2020] 8 WWR 252 [Lorencz]. Statutory Interpretation – The Governing Principles [23]      &#......
  • STEPHENS v. MLT AIKINS LLP et al,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 17 Diciembre 2021
    ...sue for economic loss when a family member died from the alleged unlawful act or omission of another. As observed in Lorencz v Talukdar, 2020 SKCA 28 at para 75, 446 DLR (4th) 487, Lord Campbell’s Act was likely received as law in the Northwest Territories before Saskatchewan became ......
  • Manderscheid v Humboldt Smiles Dental Studios Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 19 Marzo 2021
    ...be applied to the interpretation of a statute is correctness: Housen v Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 SCR 235, and Lorencz v Talukdar, 2020 SKCA 28 at para 51, 446 DLR (4th) 487. [21]        A determination that privilege exists is a question of mi......
  • Thomas v Quinlan, 2020 SKCA 82
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 8 Julio 2020
    ...of law attract the correctness standard of review: Housen v Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 SCR 235 [Housen], and Lorencz v Talukdar, 2020 SKCA 28 at para 51. [29] Mr. Thomas also asserts the Chambers judge erred in both admitting and relying on the transcript of the sentencing hearing. T......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT