LR v Semenjuk,

JudgeThe Honourable Justice Jack Watson,The Honourable Justice Ritu Khullar,The Honourable Justice Kevin Feehan
Neutral Citation2021 ABCA 318
Citation2021 ABCA 318
Docket Number2003-0119AC
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Date23 September 2021
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 practice notes
  • KY v Bahler,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 8, 2023
    ...the relationship capacities of people with cognitive limitations. Justice Burns wrote as follows in LR v Semenjuk, 2020 ABQB 350, affd 2021 ABCA 318 at para 170(QB): [170] It is asserted that individuals with cognitive limitations are less desirable to prospective partners and that damages ......
  • ATCO Energy Solutions Ltd v Energy Dynamics Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 26, 2024
    ...the sense that the actual injury was the reasonably foreseeable result of the defendant's conduct: Nelson at paras 96-97; LR v Semenjuk, 2021 ABCA 318 at para 27 [ 228 Factual causation is generally assessed using the “but-for” test, which means that the plaintiff must show on a balance of ......
  • Khaleel v Indar,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 29, 2023
    ...for” test if it is established that the injury would not have occurred but for the negligence of Dr. Indar: LR v Semenjuk, 2021 ABCA 318 at para 27; Stacy Estate v Lukenchuk, 2020 SKCA 206 The Supreme Court, in Snell v Farrell, provides guidance on how the but for test should be appl......
  • Balogun v Pandher, 2021 ABCA 422
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • December 20, 2021
    ...that the trial judge missed an issue or misapprehended the evidence: Davidson v Patten, 2008 ABCA 65 at para 20; see also LR v Semenjuk, 2021 ABCA 318 at para 24 citing Luft v Taylor, Zinkhofer & Conway, 2017 ABCA 228 at para Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss [7]    &#x......
  • Get Started for Free
6 cases
  • KY v Bahler,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 8, 2023
    ...the relationship capacities of people with cognitive limitations. Justice Burns wrote as follows in LR v Semenjuk, 2020 ABQB 350, affd 2021 ABCA 318 at para 170(QB): [170] It is asserted that individuals with cognitive limitations are less desirable to prospective partners and that damages ......
  • ATCO Energy Solutions Ltd v Energy Dynamics Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 26, 2024
    ...the sense that the actual injury was the reasonably foreseeable result of the defendant's conduct: Nelson at paras 96-97; LR v Semenjuk, 2021 ABCA 318 at para 27 [ 228 Factual causation is generally assessed using the “but-for” test, which means that the plaintiff must show on a balance of ......
  • Khaleel v Indar,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 29, 2023
    ...for” test if it is established that the injury would not have occurred but for the negligence of Dr. Indar: LR v Semenjuk, 2021 ABCA 318 at para 27; Stacy Estate v Lukenchuk, 2020 SKCA 206 The Supreme Court, in Snell v Farrell, provides guidance on how the but for test should be appl......
  • Balogun v Pandher, 2021 ABCA 422
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • December 20, 2021
    ...that the trial judge missed an issue or misapprehended the evidence: Davidson v Patten, 2008 ABCA 65 at para 20; see also LR v Semenjuk, 2021 ABCA 318 at para 24 citing Luft v Taylor, Zinkhofer & Conway, 2017 ABCA 228 at para Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss [7]    &#x......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT