Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority),
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Morellato |
| Neutral Citation | 2017 BCSC 42 |
| Citation | 2017 BCSC 42 |
| Subject Matter | DAMAGES,CONTRACTS,EMPLOYMENT LAW |
| Docket Number | S156771 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Date | 11 January 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 practice notes
-
Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority), 2017 BCSC 42
...SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority), 2017 BCSC 42 Date: 20170111 Docket: S156771 Registry: Vancouver Between: Phuc Ly Plaintiff And: Interior Health Authority Defendant Corrected Judgment: The text of the judgment was c......
-
2023 BCSC 25,
...the position that Glenmore is still bound by the ESA in such situations. 44 In Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority), 2017 BCSC 42 [ Ly], the Employment Agreement referred to an “initial probationary period of six (6) months”. However, no further details were incl......
-
BC Supreme Court Clarifies Law Regarding Employment Probation
...key issues regarding probationary periods in employment contracts. Background In Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority), 2017 BCSC 42, the contract of employment executed by the plaintiff, Mr. Ly, contained the following probation clause: "Employees are required to serve an init......
-
Dismissing A Probationary Employee
...with at least the minimum notice required by statute. In the recent decision of Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority), 2017 BCSC 42, the BC Supreme Court clarified the law relating to dismissing a probationary Brief Facts The Interior Health Authority ("Interior Health") hired ......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority), 2017 BCSC 42
...SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority), 2017 BCSC 42 Date: 20170111 Docket: S156771 Registry: Vancouver Between: Phuc Ly Plaintiff And: Interior Health Authority Defendant Corrected Judgment: The text of the judgment was c......
-
2023 BCSC 25,
...the position that Glenmore is still bound by the ESA in such situations. 44 In Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority), 2017 BCSC 42 [ Ly], the Employment Agreement referred to an “initial probationary period of six (6) months”. However, no further details were incl......
-
Forbes v Glenmore Printing Ltd,
...the position that Glenmore is still bound by the ESA in such situations. 44 In Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority), 2017 BCSC 42 [ Ly], the Employment Agreement referred to an “initial probationary period of six (6) months”. However, no further details were incl......
-
Belsito v. 2220742 Ontario Ltd., 2017 ONSC 7207
...Ltd. (1997), 44 B.C.L.R. (3d) 327 (C.A.), at para. 29; Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority), 2017 BCSC 42, [2017] B.C.J. No. 43, at para. 42. 8 Since it is not possible to contract out of the minimum notice standards p......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 firm's commentaries
-
BC Supreme Court Clarifies Law Regarding Employment Probation
...key issues regarding probationary periods in employment contracts. Background In Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority), 2017 BCSC 42, the contract of employment executed by the plaintiff, Mr. Ly, contained the following probation clause: "Employees are required to serve an init......
-
Dismissing A Probationary Employee
...with at least the minimum notice required by statute. In the recent decision of Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority), 2017 BCSC 42, the BC Supreme Court clarified the law relating to dismissing a probationary Brief Facts The Interior Health Authority ("Interior Health") hired ......
-
'You Gotta Have (Good) Faith' ... Terminating Without Notice During The Probationary Period
...recent decision from the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority) 2017 BCSC 42, provides helpful clarification of the law on termination of probationary employees on the basis of "suitability" and sends a cautionary note about the importance of f......
-
The Utility Of Probationary Periods Called Into Question By Recent BCSC Decision
...probationary periods will provide the flexibility and protections they are intended to address. In Ly v. Interior Health Authority, 2017 BCSC 42, the Court concluded that a probationary term contained in the plaintiff's employment contract was valid and enforceable. However, the Court went ......
Request a trial to view additional results