Lyebyedyev v. Superintendent of Motor Vehicles (B.C.), [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 217

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeSchultes, J.
Citation[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 217,[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 217 (SC),2015 BCSC 217
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterMOTOR VEHICLES,CRIMINAL LAW,IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Date23 January 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Mackenzie v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2017 BCSC 2392
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 27, 2017
    ...not to be given any “baseline reliability” or “presumptive advantage”: Lyebyedyev v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCSC 217 at paras. 12 and 28; Gauder at para. 44.[58] In cases where there is a dramatic conflict in the evidence that conflict should generally, ab......
  • Uppal v. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, 2018 BCSC 2294
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 21, 2018
    ...and Labrador (Treasury Board), 2011 SCC 62 at para. 15; Lyebyedyev v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCSC 217 at para. 12. I approach my decision with that deferential standard of review in mind. [13]        The issue......
  • Mains v. Superintendent of Motor Vehicles (B.C.), [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1701
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 4, 2015
    ...was reasonably available on the evidence. This was the situation in Lyebyedyev v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) , 2015 BCSC 217. In that case, Mr. Justice Schultes found that even though the adjudicator relied on pieces of evidence that were not logically capable of su......
  • Madden v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2018 BCSC 1276
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 30, 2018
    ...may interfere if the reasoning in support of the decision is “manifestly flawed”: Lyebyedyev v. B.C. (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCSC 217 at para. 12. However, manifestly flawed reasoning is not, alone, sufficient to justify interference, because the overall task on review is t......
4 cases
  • Mackenzie v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2017 BCSC 2392
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 27, 2017
    ...not to be given any “baseline reliability” or “presumptive advantage”: Lyebyedyev v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCSC 217 at paras. 12 and 28; Gauder at para. 44.[58] In cases where there is a dramatic conflict in the evidence that conflict should generally, ab......
  • Uppal v. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, 2018 BCSC 2294
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 21, 2018
    ...and Labrador (Treasury Board), 2011 SCC 62 at para. 15; Lyebyedyev v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCSC 217 at para. 12. I approach my decision with that deferential standard of review in mind. [13]        The issue......
  • Mains v. Superintendent of Motor Vehicles (B.C.), [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1701
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 4, 2015
    ...was reasonably available on the evidence. This was the situation in Lyebyedyev v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) , 2015 BCSC 217. In that case, Mr. Justice Schultes found that even though the adjudicator relied on pieces of evidence that were not logically capable of su......
  • Madden v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2018 BCSC 1276
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 30, 2018
    ...may interfere if the reasoning in support of the decision is “manifestly flawed”: Lyebyedyev v. B.C. (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCSC 217 at para. 12. However, manifestly flawed reasoning is not, alone, sufficient to justify interference, because the overall task on review is t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT