M.(K.) v. M.(H.), [1992] 3 SCR 6

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeLa Forest, Gérard V.; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Sopinka, John; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank
Date29 October 1992
Citation[1992] 3 SCR 6,AZ-92111111,1992 CanLII 31 (SCC),57 OAC 321,142 NR 321,JE 92-1644,96 DLR (4th) 289,36 ACWS (3d) 466,14 CCLT (2d) 1,EYB 1992-67549,[1992] SCJ No 85 (QL)
Docket Number21763
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
832 practice notes
  • Bowes v. Edmonton (City) et al., 2003 ABQB 492
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 30 Mayo 2003
    ...refd to. [para. 14]. NPS Farms Ltd. et al. v. Dupont Canada Inc. et al. (2001), 297 A.R. 318 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 14]. K.M. v. H.M., [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6; 142 N.R. 321; 57 O.A.C. 321; 96 D.L.R.(4th) 289, refd to. [para. Photinopoulos v. Photinopoulos et al. (1988), 92 A.R. 122; 54 D.L.R.(4t......
  • Wewayakum Indian Band v. Canada and Wewayakai Indian Band, (2002) 297 N.R. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • 6 Diciembre 2001
    ...Industries Ltd. and O'Connor (No. 2) (2002), 283 N.R. 233; 299 A.R. 201; 266 W.A.C. 201 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 107]. K.M. v. H.M., [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6; 142 N.R. 321; 57 O.A.C. 321, refd to. [para. 109]. Lindsay Petroleum Co. v. Hurd (1874), L.R. 5 P.C. 221, refd to. [para. 109]. Harris v. ......
  • Chippewas v. Can. (A.G.), (2000) 139 O.A.C. 201 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 21 Diciembre 2000
    ...v. Cooke (1829), 5 Bing. 340 (C.P.), refd to. [para. 294]. R. v. Wilkes (1770), 4 Burr. 2527, refd to. [para. 296]. K.M. v. H.M., [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6; 142 N.R. 321; 57 O.A.C. 321, appld. [para. Wewayakum Indian Band v. Canada and Wewayakai Indian Band (1995), 99 F.T.R. 1 (T.D.), refd to. [par......
  • 3464920 Canada Inc. v. Strother et al., 2005 BCCA 35
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 21 Enero 2005
    ...law and equity that occurred near the turn of the century under the auspices of the old Judicature Acts ; see also M.(K.) v. M.(H.) , [[1992] 3 S.C.R. 6], at p. 61. Thus, properly understood Canson stands for the proposition that courts should strive to treat similar wrongs similarly, regar......
  • Get Started for Free
739 cases
  • Bowes v. Edmonton (City) et al., 2003 ABQB 492
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 30 Mayo 2003
    ...refd to. [para. 14]. NPS Farms Ltd. et al. v. Dupont Canada Inc. et al. (2001), 297 A.R. 318 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 14]. K.M. v. H.M., [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6; 142 N.R. 321; 57 O.A.C. 321; 96 D.L.R.(4th) 289, refd to. [para. Photinopoulos v. Photinopoulos et al. (1988), 92 A.R. 122; 54 D.L.R.(4t......
  • Wewayakum Indian Band v. Canada and Wewayakai Indian Band, (2002) 297 N.R. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • 6 Diciembre 2001
    ...Industries Ltd. and O'Connor (No. 2) (2002), 283 N.R. 233; 299 A.R. 201; 266 W.A.C. 201 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 107]. K.M. v. H.M., [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6; 142 N.R. 321; 57 O.A.C. 321, refd to. [para. 109]. Lindsay Petroleum Co. v. Hurd (1874), L.R. 5 P.C. 221, refd to. [para. 109]. Harris v. ......
  • Chippewas v. Can. (A.G.), (2000) 139 O.A.C. 201 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 21 Diciembre 2000
    ...v. Cooke (1829), 5 Bing. 340 (C.P.), refd to. [para. 294]. R. v. Wilkes (1770), 4 Burr. 2527, refd to. [para. 296]. K.M. v. H.M., [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6; 142 N.R. 321; 57 O.A.C. 321, appld. [para. Wewayakum Indian Band v. Canada and Wewayakai Indian Band (1995), 99 F.T.R. 1 (T.D.), refd to. [par......
  • Chippewas of Sarnia Band v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., (1999) 101 O.T.C. 1 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 1 Diciembre 1997
    ...Wewayakum Indian Band v. Canada and Wewayakai Indian Band (1995), 99 F.T.R. 1 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 659, footnote 342]. K.M. v. H.M., [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6; 142 N.R. 321; 57 O.A.C. 321, refd to. [para. 660, footnote 344]. Lindsay Petroleum Co. v. Hurd (1874), L.R. 5 P.C. 221 (P.C.), refd to. ......
  • Get Started for Free
11 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 8 ' March 12, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 15 Marzo 2021
    ...[1994] 1 S.C.R. 656, Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 87, Levesque v. Crampton Estate, 2017 ONCA 455, M.(K.) v. M.(H.), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6, Beaudoin Estate v. Campbellford Memorial Hospital, 2021 ONCA 57, Pioneer Corp. v. Godfrey, 2019 SCC 42 Short Civil Decisions Paulpillai E......
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (August 28 – September 1)
    • Canada
    • LexBlog Canada
    • 3 Septiembre 2023
    ...Ermineskin Indian Band and Nation v. Canada, 2009 SCC 9, Beckman v. Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation, 2010 SCC 53, M.(K.) v. M.(H.), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6, Feather v. The Queen (1865), 122 E.R. 1191 (K.B.), Matthews v. Ministry of Defence, [2003] UKHL 4, [2003] 1 A.C. 1163, M. v. Home Office......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 25, 2022 ' July 29, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 2 Agosto 2022
    ...2011 SCC 24, Hodgkinson v Simms, [1994] 3 SCR 377, Galambos v Perez, 2009 SCC 48, Dolmage v Ontario, 2010 ONSC 1726, M(K) v M(H), [1992] 3 SCR 6, Guerin v The Queen, [1984] 2 SCR 335, (Attorney General) v Thouin, 2017 SCC 46, Kenny v Lockwood, [1932] OR 141 (CA), McInerney v MacDonald, [199......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 16 ' 20, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 23 Octubre 2023
    ...2022 ONSC 5599, McKenzie v. Walsh, [1920] 61 S.C.R. 312, Green v. Bank of Montreal, 1999 CanLII 821 (Ont. C.A.), M.(K.) v. M.(H.), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6, Chippewas of Sarnia Band v. Canada (Attorney General) (2000), 51 O.R. (3d) 641 (C.A.), leave to appeal refused, [2001] S.C.C.A. No. 63, K.(K.......
  • Get Started for Free
86 books & journal articles
  • Management and Enforcement
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Intellectual Property Law. Second Edition
    • 15 Junio 2011
    ...or misrepresentation relating to the claim: ibid. , s. 15(4). 571 Limitations Act , ibid. , s. 16(1)(a). 572 M.(K.) v. M.(H.) , [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6; Fisher , above note 338 at [79]. Management and Enforcement 663 ii) Delay Long delay in bringing a claim affects only the credibility of the com......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Insurance Law. Second Edition Enforcing Insurance Contracts
    • 23 Junio 2015
    ...& Co (1969), [1969] 2 OR 817, [1970] ILR 849, [1969] OJ No 1404 (CA) ....................................................466 KM v HM, [1992] 3 SCR 6, 96 DLR (4th) 289, 1992 CanLII 31 ......................... 225 Knudsen (Next friend of) v Gore District Mutual Fire Insurance Co (1958), 25 W......
  • Specific Performance: Discretionary Defences and Considerations that Affect Discretion
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • 18 Noviembre 2023
    ...of laches. 112 Lazard Brothers & Co v Fairield Properties Co (Mayfair) (1977), 121 Sol J 793 at 793 (Ch), Megarry VC. 113 M(K) v M(H) , [1992] 3 SCR 6 at 77–78 [ M(K) ]; Wewaykum Indian Band v Canada , 2002 SCC 79 at para 109; Manitoba Metis , above note 111 at paras 145–47. These principle......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • 21 Junio 2014
    ...1 BCLR (4th) 209, [2002] BCJ No 1125 (CA) .............................................................................. 64 M(K) v M(H), [1992] 3 SCR 6, 142 NR 321, 96 DLR (4th) 289 .......................... 333 M(M) v F(R) (1997), 101 BCAC 97, 164 WAC 97 (CA) ...................................
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT