M.(K.) v. M.(H.)

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
JudgeLa Forest, Gérard V.; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Sopinka, John; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank
Citation[1992] 3 SCR 6,AZ-92111111,1992 CanLII 31 (SCC),57 OAC 321,142 NR 321,JE 92-1644,96 DLR (4th) 289,36 ACWS (3d) 466,14 CCLT (2d) 1,EYB 1992-67549,[1992] SCJ No 85 (QL)
Date29 October 1992
Docket Number21763

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
862 practice notes
  • Broome et al. v. Prince Edward Island
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court, Appeal Division (Prince Edward Island)
    • January 22, 2009
    ...Children's Foundation et al., [1999] 2 S.C.R. 534; 241 N.R. 266; 124 B.C.A.C. 119; 203 W.A.C. 119, refd to. [para. 102]. K.M. v. H.M., [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6; 142 N.R. 321; 57 O.A.C. 321, refd to. [para. Cassidy v. Ministry of Health, [1951] 2 K.B. 343 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 123]. Authors and W......
  • Ontario (Attorney General) v. Restoule
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • July 26, 2024
    ...Management Ltd. (2001), 54 O.R. (3d) 131; Canada (Attorney General) v. Lameman, 2008 SCC 14, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 372; M. (K.) v. M. (H.), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6; National Trust Co. v. H & R Block Canada Inc., 2003 SCC 66, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 160; Hanemaayer v. Freure (1999), 2 B.L.R. (3d) 269; Tracy......
  • Alberta (Minister of Infrastructure) v. Nilsson
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • November 29, 2002
    ...[para. 171]. Lamb v. Kincaid (1907), 38 S.C.R. 516, refd to. [para. 172]. K.M. v. H.M., [1992] 3 S.C.R. 3; 142 N.R. 321; 57 O.A.C. 321; 96 D.L.R.(4th) 289, refd to. [para. R. v. Brown (A.R.R.), [1993] 2 S.C.R. 918; 155 N.R. 225; 141 A.R. 163; 46 W.A.C. 163, refd to. [para. 172]. Block Broth......
  • Waxman v. Waxman, (2004) 186 O.A.C. 201 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • April 30, 2004
    ...S.C.R. 774; 45 N.R. 302, refd to. [para. 497]. Guerin v. Canada, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 335; 55 N.R. 161, refd to. [para. 504]. K.M. v. H.M., [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6; 142 N.R. 321; 57 O.A.C. 321, refd to. [para. 506]. K.L.B. et al. v. British Columbia et al., [2003] 2 S.C.R. 403; 309 N.R. 306; 187 B.C.A......
  • Get Started for Free
754 cases
  • Scalera v. Lloyd's of London
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 3, 2000
    ...Stonehouse, [1926] 2 D.L.R. 683 (Sask. C.A.), refd to. [para. 16]. F., Re, [1990] 2 A.C. 1 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 19]. K.M. v. H.M., [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6; 142 N.R. 321; 57 O.A.C. 321, refd to. [para. Freeman v. Home Office, [1983] 3 All E.R. 589 (Q.B.), affd. [1984] 1 All E.R. 1036 (C.A.), re......
  • Bowes v. Edmonton (City) et al., 2003 ABQB 492
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen''s Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 30, 2003
    ...refd to. [para. 14]. NPS Farms Ltd. et al. v. Dupont Canada Inc. et al. (2001), 297 A.R. 318 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 14]. K.M. v. H.M., [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6; 142 N.R. 321; 57 O.A.C. 321; 96 D.L.R.(4th) 289, refd to. [para. Photinopoulos v. Photinopoulos et al. (1988), 92 A.R. 122; 54 D.L.R.(4t......
  • R. v. Chisholm (G.)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • April 9, 1997
    ...R. v. Marquard (D.), [1993] 4 S.C.R. 223; 159 N.R. 81; 66 O.A.C. 161; 85 C.C.C.(3d) 193, refd to. [para. 70, footnote 2]. K.M. v. H.M., [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6; 142 N.R. 321; 57 O.A.C. 321; 96 D.L.R.(4th) 289, refd to. [para. 70, footnote R. v. D.R., H.R. and D.W., [1996] 2 S.C.R. 291; 197 N.R. 3......
  • Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. Green
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 4, 2015
    ...42, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 559; Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd. (Re), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 27; Novak v. Bond, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 808; M. (K.) v. M. (H.), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6; Coulson v. Citigroup Global Markets Canada Inc., 2010 ONSC 1596, 92 C.P.C. (6th) 301, aff’d 2012 ONCA 108, 288 O.A.C. 355; Bou Malhab v.......
  • Get Started for Free
11 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 8 ' March 12, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 15, 2021
    ...[1994] 1 S.C.R. 656, Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 87, Levesque v. Crampton Estate, 2017 ONCA 455, M.(K.) v. M.(H.), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6, Beaudoin Estate v. Campbellford Memorial Hospital, 2021 ONCA 57, Pioneer Corp. v. Godfrey, 2019 SCC 42 Short Civil Decisions Paulpillai E......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 28 ' September 1)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 5, 2023
    ...Ermineskin Indian Band and Nation v. Canada, 2009 SCC 9, Beckman v. Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation, 2010 SCC 53, M.(K.) v. M.(H.), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6, Feather v. The Queen (1865), 122 E.R. 1191 (K.B.), Matthews v. Ministry of Defence, [2003] UKHL 4, [2003] 1 A.C. 1163, M. v. Home Office......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 26-30)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 3, 2025
    ...Lafrance Estate v. Canada (Attorney General) (2003), 64 O.R. (3d) 1 (C.A.), Norberg v. Wynrib, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 226, M.(K.) v. M.(H.), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6, First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada et al. v. Attorney General of Canada (for the Minister of Indian and Northern Affa......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 16 ' 20, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 23, 2023
    ...2022 ONSC 5599, McKenzie v. Walsh, [1920] 61 S.C.R. 312, Green v. Bank of Montreal, 1999 CanLII 821 (Ont. C.A.), M.(K.) v. M.(H.), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6, Chippewas of Sarnia Band v. Canada (Attorney General) (2000), 51 O.R. (3d) 641 (C.A.), leave to appeal refused, [2001] S.C.C.A. No. 63, K.(K.......
  • Get Started for Free
87 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Civil Litigation
    • June 16, 2010
    ...45 M. v. H., [1999] 2 S.C.R. 3, 171 D.L.R. (4th) 577, [1999] S.C.J. No. 23 .............. 132 M.(K.) v. M.(H.), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6, 96 D.L.R. (4th) 289, [1992] S.C.J. No. 85 ..... 74 MacDonald v. Ontario Hydro (1994), 19 O.R. (3d) 529, 38 C.P.C. (3d) 378, [1994] O.J. No. 1670 (Gen. Div.), af......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Education Law in Canada. A Guide for Teachers and Administrators
    • June 21, 2017
    ...School Division No 74, [1992] SJ No 198, 1992 CanLII 7997 (QB) ....................................... 63, 64, 132–33 M(K) v M(H) (1992), 96 DLR (4th) 289 (SCC) .........................................................159 MacCabe v Westlock Roman Catholic Separate School District No 110, 20......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Torts. Third Edition
    • September 2, 2007
    ...124 Table of Cases 461 M.(K.) v. M.(H.), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6, 96 D.L.R. (4th) 289, 142 N.R. 321, 14 C.C.L.T. (2d) 1 .................................................................................241, 414 M’Alister (or Donoghue) v. Stevenson, [1932] A.C. 562, 48 T.L.R. 494, (sub nom. McAlist......
  • Management and Enforcement
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Intellectual Property Law. Second Edition
    • June 15, 2011
    ...or misrepresentation relating to the claim: ibid. , s. 15(4). 571 Limitations Act , ibid. , s. 16(1)(a). 572 M.(K.) v. M.(H.) , [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6; Fisher , above note 338 at [79]. Management and Enforcement 663 ii) Delay Long delay in bringing a claim affects only the credibility of the com......
  • Get Started for Free