M.A.(L.)B. v. T.J.L., 2021 NBCA 5
| Jurisdiction | New Brunswick |
| Judge | The Honourable Justice Green,The Honourable Justice French,The Honourable Justice LaVigne |
| Date | 25 March 2021 |
| Citation | 2021 NBCA 5 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (New Brunswick) |
| Docket Number | 60-20-CA |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
AR v JU, 2021 ABCA 337
...and where the child is old enough and mature enough, his or her wishes and preferences (para. 120). LaVigne J.A., in M.A.(L.)B. v. T.J.L., 2021 NBCA 5, 2021 N.B.J. No. 24 (QL), describes the consideration of this principle as “mandatory” (para. 56); however, as McLachlin J. stated in Gordon......
-
R.J. v. P.J.,
...and where the child is old enough and mature enough, his or her wishes and preferences (para. 120). LaVigne J.A., in M.A.(L.)B. v. T.J.L., 2021 NBCA 5, 2021 N.B.J. No. 24 (QL), describes the consideration of this principle as “mandatory” (para. 56); however, as McLachlin J. st......
-
B. C. v. B. Mc,
...make long-range predictions. [105] It was also more recently discussed in M.A.(L.) B. v. T.J.L., 2021 NBCA 5 (N.B.C.A.) the Court said at para. A trial judge is not compelled to discuss each of the factors enumerated in Gordon: A.G. v. M.M., 2018 NB......
-
Bourgeois v. R.,
...a more lenient sentence. The onus of demonstrating bias on appeal rests with the individual who asserts it (M.A.(L.)B. v. T.J.L., 2021 NBCA 5, [2021] N.B.J. No. 24 (QL); and Vautour et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Province of New Brunswick et al., 2021 NBCA 4, [2021] ......
4 cases
-
AR v JU, 2021 ABCA 337
...and where the child is old enough and mature enough, his or her wishes and preferences (para. 120). LaVigne J.A., in M.A.(L.)B. v. T.J.L., 2021 NBCA 5, 2021 N.B.J. No. 24 (QL), describes the consideration of this principle as “mandatory” (para. 56); however, as McLachlin J. stated in Gordon......
-
R.J. v. P.J.,
...and where the child is old enough and mature enough, his or her wishes and preferences (para. 120). LaVigne J.A., in M.A.(L.)B. v. T.J.L., 2021 NBCA 5, 2021 N.B.J. No. 24 (QL), describes the consideration of this principle as “mandatory” (para. 56); however, as McLachlin J. st......
-
B. C. v. B. Mc,
...make long-range predictions. [105] It was also more recently discussed in M.A.(L.) B. v. T.J.L., 2021 NBCA 5 (N.B.C.A.) the Court said at para. A trial judge is not compelled to discuss each of the factors enumerated in Gordon: A.G. v. M.M., 2018 NB......
-
Bourgeois v. R.,
...a more lenient sentence. The onus of demonstrating bias on appeal rests with the individual who asserts it (M.A.(L.)B. v. T.J.L., 2021 NBCA 5, [2021] N.B.J. No. 24 (QL); and Vautour et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Province of New Brunswick et al., 2021 NBCA 4, [2021] ......