M.L.S. v. N.E.D.
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Judge | GOEBEL J. |
| Citation | 2017 SKQB 183 |
| Date | 21 June 2017 |
| Docket Number | DIV 192 of 2003 |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 12-15, 2021)
...A.P. v. L.K., 2021 ONSC 150, X. v. Y., 2016 ONSC 4333, J.C.W. v. J.K.R.W., 2014 BCSC 488, E.T. v. L.D., 2018 ONSC 5132, M.L.S. v. N.E.D., 2017 SKQB 183, Belcourt v. Charlebois, 2020 ONSC 4124 Tanti v. Tanti, 2021 ONCA 717 Keywords: Family Law, Domestic Contracts, Validity, Capacity, Civil P......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 12-15, 2021)
...A.P. v. L.K., 2021 ONSC 150, X. v. Y., 2016 ONSC 4333, J.C.W. v. J.K.R.W., 2014 BCSC 488, E.T. v. L.D., 2018 ONSC 5132, M.L.S. v. N.E.D., 2017 SKQB 183, Belcourt v. Charlebois, 2020 ONSC 4124 Tanti v. Tanti, 2021 ONCA 717 Keywords: Family Law, Domestic Contracts, Validity, Capacity, Civil P......
-
Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
...resolution process, in my view, are a reflection of the growing body of research about the effects of separation 70 71 72 73 MLS v NED, 2017 SKQB 183 at para 168, Goebel J; Hinz v Hinz, 2017 SKQB See text in above note 52. See Divorce Act, ss 7.3,7.7(2), and 16.1(5). See also Brendan Forres......
-
Parenting Arrangements after Divorce
...& Alexander Masardo, “Law Reform for Shared-Time Parenting After Separation: Reflections from Australia” 30 SAcLJ 518 (2018). MLS v NED, 2017 SKQB 183 at para 168, Goebel J; Hinz v Hinz, 2017 SKQB See text in above note 52. See Divorce Act, ss 7.3,7.7(2), and 16.1(5). See Divorce Act, s 16.......
Get Started for Free
2 cases
-
SHOMAN v. MAIS
...SKQB 14; Howe v Whiteway, 2015 SKCA 72, 65 RFL (7th) 23 [Howe]; Aalbers v Aalbers, 2011 SKCA 156, 385 Sask R 141; M.L.S. v N.E.D., 2017 SKQB 183; McGinn v McGinn, 2006 SKQB 105; Kittelson‑Schurr v Schurr, 2005 SKQB 90; and Johns v Hinkson (1996), 151 Sask R 168 [47] &#......
-
SP v BP
...sought. These include AA v SNA, 2009 BCSC 387, AGL v KBD (2009), 93 OR (3d) 409 (SC), LDK v MAK, 2015 BCSC 226, M v M, supra, MLS v NED, 2017 SKQB 183 [“MLS”], AGL v KBD, (2009) 93 O.R. (3d) 409, SGB v SJL #2, 2010 ONSC 3717, and Williamson v Williamson, 2016 BCCA 87, all of which I have re......
2 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 12-15, 2021)
...A.P. v. L.K., 2021 ONSC 150, X. v. Y., 2016 ONSC 4333, J.C.W. v. J.K.R.W., 2014 BCSC 488, E.T. v. L.D., 2018 ONSC 5132, M.L.S. v. N.E.D., 2017 SKQB 183, Belcourt v. Charlebois, 2020 ONSC 4124 Tanti v. Tanti, 2021 ONCA 717 Keywords: Family Law, Domestic Contracts, Validity, Capacity, Civil P......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 12-15, 2021)
...A.P. v. L.K., 2021 ONSC 150, X. v. Y., 2016 ONSC 4333, J.C.W. v. J.K.R.W., 2014 BCSC 488, E.T. v. L.D., 2018 ONSC 5132, M.L.S. v. N.E.D., 2017 SKQB 183, Belcourt v. Charlebois, 2020 ONSC 4124 Tanti v. Tanti, 2021 ONCA 717 Keywords: Family Law, Domestic Contracts, Validity, Capacity, Civil P......
2 books & journal articles
-
Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
...resolution process, in my view, are a reflection of the growing body of research about the effects of separation 70 71 72 73 MLS v NED, 2017 SKQB 183 at para 168, Goebel J; Hinz v Hinz, 2017 SKQB See text in above note 52. See Divorce Act, ss 7.3,7.7(2), and 16.1(5). See also Brendan Forres......
-
Parenting Arrangements after Divorce
...& Alexander Masardo, “Law Reform for Shared-Time Parenting After Separation: Reflections from Australia” 30 SAcLJ 518 (2018). MLS v NED, 2017 SKQB 183 at para 168, Goebel J; Hinz v Hinz, 2017 SKQB See text in above note 52. See Divorce Act, ss 7.3,7.7(2), and 16.1(5). See Divorce Act, s 16.......
