M.M. v. United States of America,

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, Beverley; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Cromwell, Thomas Albert; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Wagner, Richard; Côté, Suzanne
Citation2015 SCC 62,[2015] 3 SCR 973
Date11 December 2015
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Docket Number35838

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
60 practice notes
  • F. v. N.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 2, 2022
    ...AG v. Iamgold Corp., 2021 FCA 110; Larche v. Ontario (1990), 75 D.L.R. (4th) 377; M.M. v. United States of America, 2015 SCC 62, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 973; Cannock v. Fleguel, 2008 ONCA 758, 303 D.L.R. (4th) 542; R.F. v. M.G., [2002] R.D.F. 785; Brown v. Pulley, 2015 ONCJ 186, 60 R.F.L. (7th) 436......
  • R. v. Pan,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • April 10, 2025
    ...2016 SCC 33, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1000; R. v. Arcuri, 2001 SCC 54, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 828; M.M. v. United States of America, 2015 SCC 62, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 973; R. v. Kelsie, 2019 SCC 17, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 101; R. v. Wolfe, 2024 SCC 34; R. v. R.P., 2012 SCC 22, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 746; R. v. Land, 2019 ONC......
  • Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • July 14, 2016
    ...v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2013 SCC 36, [2013] 2 S.C.R. 559; M.M. v. United States of America, 2015 SCC 62, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 973; Kanthasamy v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 SCC 61, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 909; Tervita Corp. v. Canada (Commissioner of Competit......
  • R v Pan,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • April 10, 2025
    ...2016 SCC 33, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1000; R. v. Arcuri, 2001 SCC 54, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 828; M.M. v. United States of America, 2015 SCC 62, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 973; R. v. Kelsie, 2019 SCC 17, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 101; R. v. Wolfe, 2024 SCC 34; R. v. R.P., 2012 SCC 22, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 746; R. v. Land, 2019 ONC......
  • Get Started for Free
44 cases
  • F. v. N.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 2, 2022
    ...AG v. Iamgold Corp., 2021 FCA 110; Larche v. Ontario (1990), 75 D.L.R. (4th) 377; M.M. v. United States of America, 2015 SCC 62, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 973; Cannock v. Fleguel, 2008 ONCA 758, 303 D.L.R. (4th) 542; R.F. v. M.G., [2002] R.D.F. 785; Brown v. Pulley, 2015 ONCJ 186, 60 R.F.L. (7th) 436......
  • R. v. Pan,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • April 10, 2025
    ...2016 SCC 33, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1000; R. v. Arcuri, 2001 SCC 54, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 828; M.M. v. United States of America, 2015 SCC 62, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 973; R. v. Kelsie, 2019 SCC 17, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 101; R. v. Wolfe, 2024 SCC 34; R. v. R.P., 2012 SCC 22, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 746; R. v. Land, 2019 ONC......
  • Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • July 14, 2016
    ...v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2013 SCC 36, [2013] 2 S.C.R. 559; M.M. v. United States of America, 2015 SCC 62, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 973; Kanthasamy v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 SCC 61, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 909; Tervita Corp. v. Canada (Commissioner of Competit......
  • R v Pan,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • April 10, 2025
    ...2016 SCC 33, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1000; R. v. Arcuri, 2001 SCC 54, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 828; M.M. v. United States of America, 2015 SCC 62, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 973; R. v. Kelsie, 2019 SCC 17, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 101; R. v. Wolfe, 2024 SCC 34; R. v. R.P., 2012 SCC 22, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 746; R. v. Land, 2019 ONC......
  • Get Started for Free
16 books & journal articles
  • Proving and Fighting Committal: Evidentiary Issues
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Extradition Cases: A Practitioner's Handbook
    • May 2, 2017
    ...76 Yang , supra note 5 at para 63. 77 Ferras , supra note 1 at para 53. See also MM v United States of America , 2015 SCC 62 at para 75, [2015] 3 SCR 973 . 242 Prosecuting and Defending Extradition Cases: A Practitioner’s Handbook The Supreme Court in MM held that before the extradition jud......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books International & Transnational Criminal Law. Third Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...439 ................................................................................................. 320 MM v United States of America, [2015] 3 SCR 973, 2015 SCC 62 ..................................................546, 548, 549, 552, 553, 554, 555 Mladić, (IT-09-92-T), Trial Chamber Judg......
  • Submission to the Minister and the Minister's Surrender Decision
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Extradition Cases: A Practitioner's Handbook
    • May 2, 2017
    ..., 2002 SCC 1 at para 39, [2002] 1 SCR 3; and Idziak , supra note 1 at 658. 3 MM v United States of America , 2015 SCC 62 at para 25, [2015] 3 SCR 973; and Németh v Canada (Justice) , 2010 SCC 56 at para 64, [2010] 3 SCR 281 . 4 Lake , supra note 2 at para 31; Idziak , supra note 1; and Cana......
  • Rules Relating to the Use of Admissible Evidence
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...2.5, “Warnings in Identification Cases,” above in this chapter. 140 R v Mezzo , [1986] 1 SCR 802. 141 MM v United States of America , [2015] 3 SCR 973 [ MM v USA ]. 142 Hay , above note 58 at para 41. Rules Relating to the Use of Admissible Evidence 701 very limited case of eyewitness ident......
  • Get Started for Free