M. McIsaac Family Holdings Ltd. v. Tolam Holdings Ltd.,

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice Fenlon,The Honourable Madam Justice Griffin,The Honourable Mr. Justice Butler
Neutral Citation2020 BCCA 371
Citation2020 BCCA 371
Date21 December 2020
Docket NumberCA46721; CA46722
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Sellathurai v Bremjit,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • June 16, 2023
    ...evidence and the live issues in the case: R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51 at para. 64; M. McIsaac Family Holdings Ltd. v. Tolam Holdings Ltd., 2020 BCCA 371 at para. 106. The failure of a trial judge to address critical evidence on a disputed issue at trial may constitute a palpable and overridin......
  • 2023 BCSC 992,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...effect on the value of the shares caused by the oppression itself”. 69 In M. McIsaac Family Holdings Ltd. v. Tolam Holdings Ltd., 2020 BCCA 371, our Court of Appeal explained that when selecting other dates for a valuation of shares in the context of an oppression remedy claim, the c......
  • Tophay Leo Farms Ltd v Wu,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 9, 2023
    ...effect on the value of the shares caused by the oppression itself”. 69 In M. McIsaac Family Holdings Ltd. v. Tolam Holdings Ltd., 2020 BCCA 371, our Court of Appeal explained that when selecting other dates for a valuation of shares in the context of an oppression remedy claim, the c......
  • J. Holmes Holdings Ltd v Canada (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 1, 2023
    ...that justice had been done, and were adequate to provide for appellate review: M. McIsaac Family Holdings Ltd. v. Tolam Holdings Ltd., 2020 BCCA 371 at paras. 18 While the judge's reasons do not specifically address the putative 30-day deadline, it is evident from the record that the i......
4 cases
  • Sellathurai v Bremjit,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • June 16, 2023
    ...evidence and the live issues in the case: R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51 at para. 64; M. McIsaac Family Holdings Ltd. v. Tolam Holdings Ltd., 2020 BCCA 371 at para. 106. The failure of a trial judge to address critical evidence on a disputed issue at trial may constitute a palpable and overridin......
  • 2023 BCSC 992,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...effect on the value of the shares caused by the oppression itself”. 69 In M. McIsaac Family Holdings Ltd. v. Tolam Holdings Ltd., 2020 BCCA 371, our Court of Appeal explained that when selecting other dates for a valuation of shares in the context of an oppression remedy claim, the c......
  • Tophay Leo Farms Ltd v Wu,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 9, 2023
    ...effect on the value of the shares caused by the oppression itself”. 69 In M. McIsaac Family Holdings Ltd. v. Tolam Holdings Ltd., 2020 BCCA 371, our Court of Appeal explained that when selecting other dates for a valuation of shares in the context of an oppression remedy claim, the c......
  • J. Holmes Holdings Ltd v Canada (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 1, 2023
    ...that justice had been done, and were adequate to provide for appellate review: M. McIsaac Family Holdings Ltd. v. Tolam Holdings Ltd., 2020 BCCA 371 at paras. 18 While the judge's reasons do not specifically address the putative 30-day deadline, it is evident from the record that the i......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT